Hi,
If by mistake standard PO created instead of Import PO, GR & MIRO posted without entry of custom MIRO and also Material has been consumed. Now is there any provision to post custom MIRO entry??
Hi,
If by mistake standard PO created instead of Import PO, GR & MIRO posted without entry of custom MIRO and also Material has been consumed. Now is there any provision to post custom MIRO entry??
Dear Experts,
I want to make the line item number and the PO number mandatory when an end user is using MB1B and movement type 541.
I mean when I go to MB1B, and select the from PO button, I want the system to make the PO number and Line item mandatory
I am doing this to for the subcontracting scenario.
Please tell me how it will happen
Burzes
Hi
We are purchasing service from Another country & supplier send the quotation with taxes .Now I don't want to take set off of this taxes. I want to load all this taxes on this service instead of planned delivery .& I want service material document entry in the similer way of inventories tax code used in po.
Please suggest how this achieve this.I search but not find appropriate answer.Because service is not asset or inventory where we load taxes .
Thanks & Regards
Ragini.
for a given business process, I create an accounting assignment caterory which includes Asset, cost center, internal order, fund center and functional area. During the creation of the PO (ME21N) when I enter the asset number all the information are brought from the asset master record except the Internal Order.
please help, how to proceed if I d like to have the Internal order defaulted
thanks
Hi,
I am getting the following error while automatically converting PR to PO thorugh ME59N:
"Internal system error during blocking"
Message Class - 06 and Message Number - 002.
Can anyone suggest that what exactly is this error and how to rectify this.
We have checked all the Lokced entry list in the system, but none of the tables/objects related to MM are locked.
Even we are able to do it through ME21n manually.
Please help!!
Thanks
Neha
Message was edited by: Jürgen L
Dear All,
STO
We are working on a IS-Retail Scenario where we are dealing with generic articles. While creating a PO, we have encountered an error which says:"Also specify a delivery type in case of shipping data relevance". The error message number is MEPO 099. We have checked that Delivery type NL is attached to the document type under the supplying site customizing, and supplying site is attached to the receiving site with the correct document type. Can anybody throw some light on what we might be missing out in this scenario?
best Regards,
Ttony
How can i check whether the material is in deletion flag ?
if material is in deletion flag , can we remove the deletion flag ?
Hi Guys,
I had a Purchase Requisition that was converted from planned order, it was created several days ago and I did see it in ME53N. But today when I was trying to display the PR in ME53N, it throws a message "Purchase requisition does no exist". I checked the table EBAN the PR is not there.
In this forum I found some similar discussions on the same issue, but it was referring to PR which was generated automatically by MRP run, but in my situation the PR is converted from planned order, I'm not sure if this is related to MRP settings.
Can anybody provide some suggestions on my issue? Thanks in advance.
Danny
Dear, Internal batch management is following in my company. Problem: when user create a new batch by T/code: MSC1N. In basic data 1, batch status - automatically tick on Batch restricted. Our clients want that it will automatically click on unrestricted. Kindly suggest the configuration or way. Thanks
During MRP run system is raising PR for particular material but the thing is in Material master for that material i have not maintained Special procurement key 30(subcontracting) even though system is raising PR with item category L
Pls suggest...
HI Friends,
I wanted to make PR non editable after covering into PO. PR should be editable if it is not converted into PO, But after conveting into PO, PR's any field should not be editable.
Please help to make changes.
Regards,
Vishal Garg
Hi guys,
my question is this: when I create a contract and the inforecord update indicator (EKPO-SPINF) is updated with a value different from blank (A, B C etc..) the field material group becomes not editable...It is independent that there is a Call off linked to that contr item, an IR or GR or other..it is sufficient that SPINF is not blank..Which is the business reason for this?
I have searched into the forum and looked at the Notes 675523, 569885, 430543, 202173 13127, 653228 etc... without results..
Thanks in advance
Bye to all
Massimiliano
Dear Experts,
We would like to restrict command PDF!
Background of Query--We have restricted po print unless it is being released. The restiction is done for one perticluar company code.
In ME23N, the icon of print in print preview tab, has been disabled. User can view only print preview. All printing options are disabled in print preview.
But, our worry is that, if user use command PDF! in print previw, he can down load PDF and take print and he may send PDF to vendor by external email.
Pls refer screen shot.
So, how to restrict command PDF! in ECC 6.0
To the point anwers will be appreciated.
Regds,
nilesh
Hi Team,
While creating Account assignment –K purchase order we want automatic G/l and cost centre updation into the purchase order.
Is it possible in SAP with configuration.
My material type is –NLAG –no accounting view.
Further while receiving the material with Migo-101 MVT type it is showing Plant and storage location whereas for Account assignment
purchases storage location will not appear, why it is appearing.
Please advice.
Thanks & Regards,
While configuring new plant , value update indicator for one
material type was missed out.
Now goods receipts have been posted in the plant also the materials
have been moved out using sales order .
Now we corrected the configuration in our testing client.
Value update indicator has been set for the material type.
But, due to stock postings done earlier with missing value update
indicator, table MBEW has not updated with stock and value.
Other stock tables MARD and MCHB are updated.
Now after value update indicator set in testing client, when we are posting goods
issue against delivery we are getting error 'valuated stok becomes negative:*-->see long text'.
Please suggest if there is way to update the MBEW table for stock
already existing in plant .
We will not be able to implement the value update indicator in GNP
with the error occuring since it will directly affect sales
Sampada V Desale
Hello all,
I want to create a tax code which is not a % but a fixed amount.
I created a new condition ZIPC copying JIPC but kept the calculation type as B i.e. Fixed Amount. I created a new Input tax code in FTXP.
Now when i try to maintain the amount in a condition via FV11 using the new condition type ZIPC i get the error message Message no. VK010
"Enter a Currency"
I had entered INR against the amount yet I keep getting this error.
Kindly advise.
Thanks in advance.
Kavita
Hi,
I want to make reservation field mandatory for movement type 311.
I tried to add field RSNUM(Reservation) in OMJJ but system show error
Please advise..
Regards,
RP Jaiswal
Hi Buddy
I have creating the following release strategy
1. PO Type: ZSV8
Purchase Group: 341
Release Group: GP
Release Strategy: H4
PO Amount >= 200,000 JPY
--------
2. PO Type: ZSV8
Purchase Group: 341
Release Group: GP
Release Strategy: H3
PO Amount < 200,000 JPY
----------
Eg: Point 1. If I have give less than 200000 amount in PO , release strategy is not triggering as per first point
Point 2. If I have give more than 200000 amount in PO , release strategy is not triggering as per first point.
Can you anybody tell me, how system will behave while creating PO for respective amount. that means while PO based on above amounts system is not triggering the respective release strategy for respective amounts.
Kindly tell me are there any settings is missing.
Thank you.
Regards
asuvamsi
Hi,
We have a purchasing scenario where some Entry Tax needs to be debited to cost of material (loaded to material cost) and credited to Tax payable account and not to Vendor Account.
Can anyone provide some idea how to handle this scenario? May be same action required while doing Invoice Verification (MIRO)?
Thanks in advance
Hello,
Can anyone provide an information regarding the MM period closing (MMPV) when the first period of the new fiscal year is to be opend.
The requirement: new fiscal year required - Oct 2013 - Ser 2014 & so on.
Current fiscal year is equal to calender year.
We have changed the fiscal year variant and maintained 2013 as shortened fiscal year (Jan(01) - Sep (09)).
On first october how should I perform MM period closing? On 30st sep the current period/previous period would be 09-2013/08-2013.
How can I skip 10-2013 to 12-2013 while executing MMPV transaction, my sysem does not allow me to open 01/2014 diectly with MMPV.
Can anyone provide the solution to this problem.
Thanks