Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live

Wrong tax triggered in PO

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I am creating new PO and when I entered vendor the wrong tax code is triggered in PO.

There is no info record(vendor-material)?

Could you please advise from where this tax is taken. I have checked vendor master data but cannot find tax code there?

 

Mark


In ME38 If (EKET-MENGE) > (EKPO-KTMNG)Schedule lines should not be created

$
0
0

Hi,

 

 

Our Requirement is in ME38 which is for creting Schdule line Agrement the system should not allow to create schedule lines

 

if the Total of Schedule Line Quantity > Total Scheduled Quantity  (Sum of all EKET-MENGE) > (EKPO-KTMNG) . I use MRP, so MRP generates schedule lines automatically. But my question is why it generates more schedule quantity than  targed quantity (ekpo-ktmng)

 

 

 

 

Please, anybody knows how can I solve this problem?

 

 

Thanks.

 

 

Line type from Inform Type to Standard Line in PO

$
0
0

Hi All

 

Is it possible to change line types from 'Inform type' to 'standard type' in PO under services tab?

 

 

Regards

 

Pankaj

Committed qty in STO - system unconfirming on saving sto

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have an issue testing a delivery split in our development system. I've created an STO, and when I check the availability the committed qty column is populated with the delivery qty in the STO (so everything looks fine) - however when I save the STO this column goes back to 0, its as if saving the STO causes the quantity to become uncommitted.

 

Therefore I cannot create the delivery in VL10f as there is no committed qty

I have checked MD04 for the materials in the issuing plant and there is no problems with stock.

 

Has anyone encountered this problem before? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

RM06ENP1 amount not found instead of 0

$
0
0

Hello everybody,

 

I have this issue with Scheduling agreement price condition after validity.

It is correct that RM06ENP1 updates EKPO table so 0 won't show when posting.

 

I observe another scenario.

For example. I have an SA with one line of price condition, let's say, Valid from April 1 to 10.

Current date today has already passed 10, so price should show 0.

 

In order to update the table, program RM06ENP1 should be executed.

When I tried to run the program, it shows that the SA I created was processed.

However, it shows that no SAs were changed.

 

How come the value did not turn to 0. Though its already invalid and program was executed.

The value should turn to 0 instead of resulting to "NOT FOUND", which cause the table to not be updated.

 

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance!

MRP: Question on Delivery date vs. Release date

$
0
0

An MRP requisition was created on 4/9/2015, for a material that has a Planned Delivery time = 7 days.  Planned delivery time (MARC-PLIFZ), per the help text, is determined based on WORKDAYS.  So the system computed the Delivery Date (EEIND) on the requisition correct, as 4/20/15, which is 7 WORKDAYS from 4/9/2015).  However, the MRP run also defaulted the “release date” (EBAN-FRGDT) on the MRP requisition to 04/13/2015.  WHY?  Why wouldn't the 'release date' be 04/09/2015, since it takes 7 days to receive the material? 

 

It looks like SAP counted 7 CALENDAR days back from the Delivery Date(EEIND) to get the release date of 4/13/2015.

 

There is no sourcing list, info record, or contract related to this material/requisition.

 

Please see attached screen prints.

Define Plant field "Name 2" Use

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

I searched SCN and coundlnt find the use of Name2 field

Path- Spro-ES-Definition-LG-Define copy delete check plant-Define Plant - Here field "NAME2"

 

What will hapen if I enter 24 alpha numeric value in it, where it will display ?

 

Appriciate your help

 

Thx

SS

MRP Purchase Requisition Planned delivery Date from Contract

$
0
0

Dear Experts:

 

We have a situation:

We set up the auto PO including source list which assigned the contract. However we find the planned delivery date for the purchase requisition is from contract, which purchaser didn't maintain on purpose, they were copied from material master when the contract was created.  The To-be process is MRP controller will review the planned delivery date periodically and update the material master. However the contracts are controlled by purchasing department, it's not feasible to ask the purchasing to change the contract frequently.

 

Could you give your two cents about this scenario

1. any flag we can set to make the planned delivery day is from material master, rather than source list- contract

2. If using program to upgrade contract delivery date? Any suggest on update this date.

 

Thank you

 

Janey


Memorized Purchase Orders

$
0
0

Hello Folks!

 

 

 

     I have a doubt about memorized purchase orders and I still can't find out.

 

 

 

     Is there a way to find all memorized purchase orders on SAP by a table or transaction? I know that when you memorize a PO, the number generates and commit at the table, commiting  the budget on it. I would like to know if it's possible to identify when a purchase is memorized or created without display it on ME23N.

 

 

 

     Thank you very much for every help!

 

 

 

     Best Regards,

 

 

 

     Raphael Palmieri

     MM Consultant Jr.

Multiple UOM associated with rounding rule of Rounding profile

$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

We were looking for options of adding multiple UOM to the rounding profile.We have our material in base unit of measure as Cases (CS) . We have maintained the alternate units of measure for these materials as Layers(12 Cases=1 Layer) and Pallets (15 Cases= 1 Pallet). We had created rounding rule 1 whereby Layer had a 30% rounding up and rounding down value and pallets had a 70 % rounding up value alone. It is observed that we could associate with only 1 of the alternate Unit in rounding profile even though rounding rule is associated with more than 1. Is there an option whereby system could do the rounding based on the alternate UOM selected when we have rules with multiple UOM defined and when the material master has multiple UOM as well

 

Regards

 

Nevin

POP UP Message Internal Table Data in ME21N

$
0
0

Hi All,

I've a requirement that,When they are creating PO. I have to show the POP Up information which vendor will supply this Material.

Some thing like this.

So I want to show internal table data as popup message.

Suggestions pls ,is there any function module.

 

Pranitha.

Purchase Info Record change using rm06ibi0

$
0
0

Hi All,

I am trying to change the PIR using report program:  rm06ibi0

I am getting the following error: "No batch input data for screen SAPMM06I 0102" and then "Transaction error"

Getting this error if I run the program in background process. If I run it in the foreground (just pressing enter) there are no errors.

 

Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks in advance.

 

 

Thank you,
Chandra Indukuri

 


Change Transfer reservations from 311 to 411

$
0
0

Hi,

I created  material A, and extended to two storage locations 1 &2.

storage location 1 contains consignment stock

storage location 2 contains own stock

 

MRP should replenish storage location 2 from storage location one via Transfer Reservation

 

I have all this configured but when I run MRP the transfer reservation gives me movement code 311.

 

What configuration do I need to change this to 411 or 411k?

 

 

Thanks

Release procedure triggering for fields not classified

$
0
0


Hello experts,

 

The classification for release procedure for PO in our current system are using 3 fields:

1) Company code

2) P.Org.

3) Currency : >0 currency unit

 

Now, when we change an existing text in the PO, no release procedure is triggered. But in case, if we add a new text to the PO (any new text at header or item level), the release procedure is triggered and goes for approval. Please guide me as why the addition of text to a PO is triggering the release procedure and what should I do to avoid so.

 

Thanks.

Richa

Relationship Object Missing

$
0
0

An custom output message type has been created for goods receipt material document .

Where the Medium is EDI. When the EDI has been processed successfully. The IDOC relationship icon is grayed out in "Services of Object " .When we look into the log we are able to see the IDOC number .

 

Not sure if its a missing link in the program or an object parameter missing in the Role .


Default vendor not appearing in freight condition type ZVCF

$
0
0


Hi All,

 

After going all the forums I am posting this issue.I have mainatined condition record for the frieght vendor with key combition of vendor, customer(Zfield) and material.

 

I have mainatined partner functions for VN with GS partner type.

 

When I create PO ZVCF condition type is triggering in the PO but in the condition type details the main vendor is picking. Could you please let me know is this standard behaviur or need to do any cutmisation for this.

 

Attched screen shots for your refernce1st screen shot.JPG2nd screenshot.JPG

 

Insted of picking GS 831092 it is picking main vendor 830970

PO Condition type.JPG

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Chand Basha Shaik

Rounding profile issue in ME57

$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

I have an issue in which we have a material with a dynamic rounding profile maintained as 50% up and 50% down. We have the material maintained in base UOM as EA. Order unit is in CS

 

test.jpg

 

The dynamic rounding profile has been maintained as 50% up and 50% down.Alt unit as LYR.

 

In MD04 we have a purchase requsition of 231 EA. When we convert it from MD04 the quantity is rounded to 200 EA = 10CS. But when we use ME57 and assign a vendor and process the assignment we get the quantity as 220 EA= 11 CS which is incorrect. Can you let us know why the difference in this behaviour

 

Regards

 

Nevin

Movt type for returns to blocked with return delivery & without delivery(adjustements)

$
0
0


Hi Experts

 

Scenario is to create a movt type which can be used to receive returns stock to blocked with returns delivery & also at times without returns delivery.

 

which std movt type can be referenced to copy (505 doesnt support delivery, 657 doesnt support without delivery)? & what other modifications need to be done ?

 

Thanks

Ram

Erro Leitura Tabelas Impostos J1BTAX

$
0
0

Boa noite,

 

Estamos configurando a J1BTAX em nosso ambiente, para atender algumas alterações da LEI 13.097/2015 referente a tributação de IPI para bebidas e nos deparamos com um problema.

 

Hoje a tributação é calculada com base em uma pauta por unidade e a partir do dia 01/05/2015 passará a ser calculada por alíquota.

 

Ocorre que mesmo incluindo as alíquotas na J1BTAX com a data de vigência atual, na geração do documento tanto por MM ou SD estão prevalecendo os valores antigos das pautas.

 

Verificamos que, eliminando a pauta e posteriormente recadastrando-a com as mesmas informações (manter histórico de tributação) o documento passa a considerar a alíquota cadastrada.

 

Ex:

 

Caso eu tenha a pauta abaixo cadastrada:

 

Material Vál.desde  Taxa imposto BaseImp Taxa/unid. Moeda N° unids. UM

10         01.04.2015                                    828,40      BRL    1.000,00  CX

 

E queria cadastrar a alíquota ficando da seguinte forma:

 

Material Vál.desde  Taxa imposto BaseImp Taxa/unid. Moeda N° unids. UM

10         15.04.2015 4                   100                         BRL                  CX

10         01.04.2015                                    828,40      BRL    1.000,00  CX

 

Ele somente irá considerar a alíquota cadastrada, se eliminar a linha da pauta. Sendo que, ao recadastrar a pauta com as mesmas informações ele permanece considerando a alíquota.

 

Como temos muitos itens cadastrados, é praticamente inviável eliminar as linhas de pauta e recadastrá-las novamente para que a alíquota seja considerada.

 

Gostaria de saber se alguém já passou por este tipo de situação e oque foi feito para corrigir o problema.

 

Passos já realizados e sem solução:

 

- Pesquisa no fórum;

- Pesquisa de notas SAP;

- Atualização das tabelas via SE14;

- Execução da "Migração de taxas de imposto para registros de condição" - J1BTAX.

 

Obrigado.

BMBC - Batch History

$
0
0

Hello friends,

 

We are trying to use BMBC and would like to activate Batch history.  I have searched SDN and found few threads to activate batch history in BMBC:

 

http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0e14a3e-ccd4-2b10-e4be-9e331d9e814c?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&38392712670133

 

I tried to follow above note and noticed Batch history nodes (as part of step 5) are not available in SPRO. I have searched SDN and understand that ECC 6.0 with EHP4 is the minimum requirement to have this functionality.

 

I have checked our system and we are on ECC 6.0 with EHP6. I am not sure why nodes are missing and what steps (BC sets or any OSS notes) need to apply.

 

Please let me know the steps to activate Batch History. Also, please let me know how far program RVBOBJTABCUST will help to bring standard values.

 

Thanks in advance for your help

Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>