Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Archive MM_EKKO: PO items flag set but header will not archive

May 15, 2015, 12:03 pm
$
0
0

We are using RM06EW70 for the write step.

I have encountered a situation where thousands of PO items are marked for deletion but the header is set for archiving.

As an example, a PO with 5 items are all marked with the flag EKPO-LOEKZ set to L.

However, when I now run the pre-proc program I get " no log generated etc" - nothing to tell me why the header is not set.

Similarly, when I run the write step I get "no data corresponding to selection found".

The question is why the items are marked but the header is not set to archive the PO document.

any ideas please how to resolve this issue?

Thanks.

Soyab

↧
Search

Identify a same material with a code/number external

May 11, 2015, 10:56 am
$
0
0

Hi SAP experts,

 

In our company need to registrate the same material in MM and to identify it with an external code or number. Then , have to consume through MB1A - MIGO .

 

(The material will be a client material)

 

 

What is the most recomendable procedure to resolve this?

 

Thaks in advance

 

 

Maria

↧
↧

why the confirmation of production do bye last data of classification in master data?

May 16, 2015, 2:53 am
$
0
0

hi every body

I change the classification data in MM02 in classification tab . few days after that the production order was created . when the confirmation is done bye co11n , data of batch is order to the last data of master data:

why the change of the master data doesn't effect in it ?

look at these please :in master data(mm02)

Capture.JPG

display of material document (mb51)

1.JPG

 

Capture3.JPG

warehouse receipt it by 51.84 M2 (quantity) but when it issue it is 40.32 M2 !!?

↧

error message-"MaterialXXX is not defined in an FFF class

April 18, 2012, 10:05 pm
$
0
0

I have created a material type-HERB. In that I have activated the checkbox for FFF class.
Now I am executing the T Code-PIC01 to main the interchangeable parts.
Here when I am giving input of my HERB material code system is showing error message-"MaterialXXX is not defined in an FFF class", message Number-MPN01055.
What I am missing here?
Can anybody please throw a light on this?
My ultimate aim is-MPN based inventory management.

Thanks & Regards
Vivek

↧

Change Service category in service master

May 13, 2015, 11:32 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Is it possible to change the service category in already created service master in AC02, if yes then is there any prerequisite for it?

 

1.jpg

 

Thanks

↧
↧

Condition MWVS manaul tax input

May 12, 2015, 12:05 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

In order to get the tax printed on Chinese purchased orders, I use the MWVS condition, created a new Access seq. with

 

SAP 3.jpg

With

KOMK - ALAND    "Country"

KOMK - MWSKZ   " Tax code "

 

My problem is now that after I have maintain the MEK1 condition MWVS, with the Tax codes for china, all is defaulte in to the item on the purchase, and maintain the tax code in the item on the invoice tab for J1.

 

SAP 4.jpg

But both the Tax code are defaulet to the item, can anyone tell me what I'm missing here.

Also I have to exclude the MWSKZ, in the access seq. in order to find the 

 

Any help is appreciated

 

Regards, Lars

↧

Set automatic delivery completed indicator in GRN(MIGO) doest update PD

May 17, 2015, 2:54 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

In SAP while doing GRN user set automatic delivery completed indicator after receiving full GRN. It should ideally update the delivery completed tick in PO. Most of the time it automatically tick. But some times even though delivery completed indicator set in GRN it doesn't update delivery completed indicator in PO. Please let me know is it a SAP bug or?. Any solution to ensure every time it should work.

 

Regards

Vivek

↧

EDI - Incoming Invoice Error and GR based Invoice Verification - 51 No GR

September 12, 2010, 5:20 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

We are implementing EDI for incoming invoices and use Goods Receipts based Invoice Verification.  When processing an inbound IDOC Invoice (type INVOIC01) where the Goods Receipt has not yet been posted, then Inbound IDOC is siiting at Error Status, 51 - No GR documents found.

 

Is there any way we can process this as a Parked Invoice or for Verification in the background (MIRA)?  because the current situation is a problem, as 95% of our Inbound Invoices will be received electronically before the Goods are Received. 

The actual Vendor's delivery note is stored in the segment E1EDP02 (Qualifier 016), field BELNR.

 

Currently the IDOC as to sit in error until the Vendor's Delivery Note is Goods Receipted which can be several days later - SAP OSS Note 393883 fro 2001 suggests doing this, but surely this is a common situation.  The IDOC sitting in error in WE02 in the list of IDOCs is difficult to isolate from true errors.

 

If this is was mnaul Invoice it could be processed through MIRA for background Invoice Verification later with program RMBABG00.

 

We havd SAP version ECC 6.0

 

I have spotted OSS Note 501524 which implies that is possible automatically Park Incoming EDI IDOC Invoices, has anyone tried this?  and what would be the transaction/program that could be used to post several at once when the GR has been processed (similar to RMBABG00)

↧
Search

Wrong Down Payment Document in PO History

May 18, 2015, 2:59 am
$
0
0

Dear SAP Expert,

 

I have a case related with PO History.

Let's say I have a PO no. 123 and whenever I check the PO History by ME23n in item 10, there are DP request, DP/DP request clearing, and DP clearing document.

The problem are:

1. DP request, which has a different purchasing document assignment (ex. PO 456), appeared in PO history 123.

2. And there is DP request, which has none purchasing document assignment, appeared also in PO history 123.

 

So it affected to the DP document or DP request clearing, there is DP document which has different PO no, in the PO history 123.

There is no case like this before in our system.

 

How could it be happened?

Thank you for your solutions before.

 

Best regards,

Rosida

↧
↧

idoc successfully posted without deleting service line

May 1, 2015, 3:53 am
$
0
0

Dear Team,

 

I am trying to delete the service line item for multiple service lines throguh Idoc (FM : BAPI_PO_CHANGE) its bit of surprising thata my IDOC is getting posted without any errors but nothing is changing ,however the value is getting changed for single line but not able to delete the service line .

I can able to delete the main line item but not the service line item .Anyone can quickly help on this i am trying since last two days but nothing worked for me .

Also kindly confirm me if is there any SAP note i need to check

 

Thanks for your support ..

 

Regards

Kiran Kumar

 

Please find Below Idoc passing values :

Header -

PO_NUMBER      C00014

DOC_TYPE      CCTC

VENDOR      0000010001

PURCH_ORG      D001

PUR_GROUP      018

CURRENCY      EUR

 

Header X

PO_NUMBER      X

DOC_TYPE      X

PURCH_ORG      X

PUR_GROUP      X

CURRENCY      X

 

Item

PO_ITEM      00010

SHORT_TEXT      ITEM 10 CHANGE

PLANT      D001

MATL_GROUP      10341

ITEM_CAT      9

ACCTASSCAT      T

PCKG_NO      0000000035

SRV_BASED_IV      X

 

Item X

PO_ITEM 00010

PO_ITEMX      X

SHORT_TEXT      X

PLANT      X

MATL_GROUP      X

ITEM_CAT      X

ACCTASSCAT      X

PCKG_NO      X

SRV_BASED_IV      X

 

PO Account :

PO_ITEM      00010

SERIAL_NO      01

WBS_ELEMENT      D-000015-01-001

RES_DOC      0050000014

RES_ITEM      001

 

Po Account X :

 

PO_ITEM      00010

SERIAL_NO      01

PO_ITEMX      X

SERIAL_NOX      X

WBS_ELEMENT      X

RES_DOC      X

RES_ITEM      X

 

Service line :

PCKG_NO      0000000035

LINE_NO      0000000001

EXT_LINE      0000000010

OUTL_IND      X

SUBPCKG_NO      0000000050

 

linkage Service line1 :

PCKG_NO      0000000050

LINE_NO      0000000002

EXT_LINE      0000000010

QUANTITY      5.00

BASE_UOM      D

PRICE_UNIT      1

GR_PRICE      5.00

SHORT_TEXT      TEST CHANGE

MATL_GROUP      10341

NET_VALUE      25.00

 

linkage Service line 2:

PCKG_NO      0000000050

LINE_NO      0000000003

EXT_LINE      0000000020

QUANTITY      5.00

BASE_UOM      D

PRICE_UNIT      1

GR_PRICE      6.00

SHORT_TEXT      TEST CHANGE

MATL_GROUP      10341

NET_VALUE      30.00

 

Account assignment dist. service line1 :

PCKG_NO      0000000050

LINE_NO      0000000002

SERNO_LINE      01

PERCENTAGE      100.00

SERIAL_NO      01

QUANTITY      5

NET_VALUE      25.00

 

Account assignment dist. service line2 :

PCKG_NO      0000000050

LINE_NO      0000000003

SERNO_LINE      01

PERCENTAGE      100.00

SERIAL_NO      01

QUANTITY      5

NET_VALUE      30.00

 

PO results after IDoc posted : Purchase order Item changes screen below

 

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X  BONGAK 01.05.2015 11:20:40 3168 WE19

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed  X BONGAK 01.05.2015 11:23:12 3169 WE19

Item Purchasing Document Item Change Date Changed 01.05.2015 30.04.2015 BONGAK 01.05.2015 11:20:40 3168 WE19

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed  X BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:41:02 3154 WE19

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X  BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:43:09 3156 WE19

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed  X BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:49:50 3157 WE19

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X  BONGAK 30.04.2015 17:00:19 3159 WE19

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed  X BONGAK 30.04.2015 17:02:33 3160 WE19

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed X  BONGAK 30.04.2015 17:37:31 3165 WE19

Item Indicator for Service-Based Invoice Verification Changed  X BONGAK 30.04.2015 17:40:29 3166 WE19

Item Purchasing Document Item Change Date Changed 30.04.2015 13.04.2015 BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:41:02 3154 WE19

Item Short Text Changed ITEM 10 CHANGE FS-FND-223 - Fees BONGAK 30.04.2015 16:41:02 3154 WE19

↧

MRP link with scheduling agreement

May 17, 2015, 2:15 pm
$
0
0

Hi ,

 

I am facing difficulty for  the  MRP  ???

For  a   scheduling  agreements ,  we  will schedule in ME38 and  according to  that  we  will  do  MIGO .

for  MRP ,  according  to  details  maintain  in  MRP in master  data , i  can  run  MRP  ???

Now  my  client  requires  ,  when  he  runs  MRP  like  scheduling  he  want  to  do  GRN  .

Before  answering  to my  client i  need  the  information  b/n  the  link for  scheduling  and  MRP

↧

Issue while creating material due to classification status

May 18, 2015, 2:25 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

In my system, I am not able to create a material with classification data under certain circumstance. While entering data in MM01 for a material with classification data, I enter class assignment information and do not enter the class status. i.e. it is set as Blank. If this is the case, the material gets saved.

 

However, if the same information is entered but this time i try to set the class status as 'Released'(under assignment subheading), the material does not get saved, there is no error message coming up from the system and the status blanks out on its own. I need to know about the class status and its behaviour while creating Material master because, I am facing a critical issue where the system automatically picks up the material class status as 'Released' and the system neither saves the material, nor does it give an error. Can someone please shed some light on this.

Appreciate your help at the earliest.

 

Thanks and regards,

Akshatha Rao.

↧

Release strategy for old purchase orders

May 15, 2015, 5:18 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

short question about release strategy. We have implemented release strategy and its working properly.

Question is: is it possible to use it for old PO's? We have updated PO's (quantity/price), but we dont see new tab for strategy and its not showing in ME28.

 

Please advise,

 

Evgenij

↧
↧

Invoice Split resulting in a Accounting Document created without Vendor Account

May 18, 2015, 3:24 am
$
0
0

We have a scenario where we ran a BAPI for MIRO consisting of 126 line item Purchase Order with one Company Code. But we experienced a very unique case where the Invoice got Split into 2 invoices.  One Invoice is having Vendor account in the accounting document . Whereas the  other Invoice was devoid of any Vendor Account in the accounting document. Do suggest any solutions & probable reasons if you have encountered similar experiences .

↧

LSMW Purchase Order History with New General Ledger

May 13, 2015, 8:51 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

we're using the Report RM06EEI1 to migration purchase order history. The program worked fine since the new general ledger () has been activated.

 

Now the system outputs the message GLT2201:

Balancing field " " in line item  not filled

 

The new GL segment splitting is based on the profit center.

 

Can anybody help?

 

Thanks in advance and best regards

  Reinhard

↧
Search

Incorrect Account determination while partial billing in FC terms

May 15, 2015, 2:17 am
$
0
0

Hello SAP Gurus,

 

Please give your valueable inputs for the following scenario:

 

We have sceanrio where there are two types of differences while doing partail billing (MIRO)

1. Difference between the GR amount and IR amount in FC terms AND

2. Foreign Exchange Gain/Loss difference

 

For eg. MIGO was done for a PO for 1 quantity @ USD 100 with prevelling exchange rate Rs. 50/USD with following entry:

 

Material Exp Account (10000)..............Dr.                         100 USD (Rs. 5000)

          To GR/IR Account (20000)                                      100 USD (Rs. 5000)

 

 

 

However, Partial invoicing was done for 0.5 quantity with USD 60 (i.e more than proportainate GR amount) and accordingly system posted following entry:

(Exchange Rate on the date of invoicing is, lets say, Rs. 52/USD)

 

GR/IR Account (20000)..................Dr.                              50 USD (Rs. 2500)

GR/IR Diff Account (10010).............Dr.                             10 USD (Rs. 620)*

Foreign Exch Diff Account (10020)..Dr.                                   -----------------

          To Vendor Account(1111)                                       60 USD (Rs. 3120)

 

*3120-2500 (taking this figure as balancing figure)

 

The above treatment of foreign exchange is not correct as per business process and GAAP as IR amount is more than the proportainate GR amount along with foreign exchange difference. Accordingly system should post the following entry with following break-up of amounts:

 

GR/IR Account (20000)........................Dr.                     50 USD (Rs. 2500)

GR/IR diff Account (10010)...................Dr.                     10 USD (Rs. 500)

Foreign Exch Diff Account (10020)........Dr.                      0 USD (Rs. 120)

          To Vendor Account(1111)                                     60 USD (3120)

 

The above treatment is correct due the fact that it should post the GR/IR difference amount at the old rate and foreign exchange difference amount seperately. However, as per SAP standard logic, system directly posts the balancing figure in the GR/IR difference account.

 

We want to have such configuration/settings such that second entry is automatically posted by the system in this type of scenarios. Request you to check the above scenario in your respective system and please let me know if anything we can do in customization / ABAP development to have correct postings.

 

 

Thanks,

Abhijeet Tare

↧

How to restrict the PO(With reference to PR only we have to create the PO)

September 10, 2009, 9:11 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Our gays are creating PO without reference of Purchase requisition.

we need to restrict the PO creation.

With out Purchase requestion system should not accept the creation of PO.

Can give me the solution.

↧
↧

Vendor Account Group Wrongly populated

May 18, 2015, 3:24 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

Really no idea whether there can be solution for this problem.Here it goes:

My client has 37 Vendor account groups for three location. There are three persons who create vendors. While doing audit we just came to know that person who is creating vendor sometimes is not entering correct vendor account group. Because of which linkage with Reconciliation account is not proper which in turn means all the Accounts Payable data is not reliable and Auditors have to manually regroup everything in excel.

 

I want that creation of vendor is accurate by some mechanism so that this error can be minimized in future. For e.g. By using USER_EXIT we can have only specific vendor account group tied to one creator id so that error get minimized or may be one vendor account group to one purchasing organization and since purchasing organization is mandatory field, corresponding vendor account group gets auto popped up. I want to clarify such thing are possible in SAP ? Please clarify. My knowledge in this regard is quite limited

 

Any other way by which we can avoid this error, if any of you guys have use done some solution's for this problem please share.

 

Regards

Aditya

↧

What is the standard function module to restrict the goods movements for a material flagged for deletion at a specific company code level.

May 18, 2015, 10:35 pm
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

As per SAP standard, even we set the deletion flag for a material, still system allowing the goods movements for a material by giving just a warning message. But, now our Business wants to make an error message to restrict the goods movements for materials which are flagged for deletion. Here, we should not change the standard warning message as Error. Because, in our Production system, there are several company codes existing. So, once we change the standard Message as Error, it would be applicable for all. It shouldn't happen in our case. Our requirement is only for one company code.

 

So, what is the standard function module / BADI can I use to restrict the goods movements for deleted materials at a specific company code level?

 

Thanks in advance for your action!!!

 

Regards,

Satya

↧

BOM in Stock Transfer Order

May 18, 2015, 9:56 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

Good morning.

 

I have a scenario in which I can see BOM components during the Stock Transfer Order.

I am having trouble finding a solution to this.

 

I have seen most of the threads on this but couldn't find the answer.

The thread BOM Explosion needed on PO and/or Delivery for Stock Transfer PO Process is still unanswered.

 

Your inputs  on the same will be highly apperciated.

Thanks to all.

↧
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>