Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live

Intercompany stock transfer return

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I have a scenario to map. Please note that I have referred to the forum and SAP notes before writing this discussion. Currently we follow the process as-  in intercompany STO process , if a faulty material was sent or it got damaged in between, then we raise a standard intercompany STO to revert the material back to the supplying plant. Only this case the supplying plant is treated as the receiving plant.

 

My requirement is I  have to map a return scenario for intercompany STO. I have known of two existing process which are used.

 

1. Using a return STO (With return indicator) ticked in the purchase order.

2. Using return delivery to vendor (122) via delivery.

 

I believe scenario 2 does not fit in to this case  as even though intercompany STO can be treated as a standard PO (where we don't need item category as U),  so return delivery fits into it. But at the same time I see that once  I move the material outside the plant premises via 122 , the process ends up with a credit note generation. The concern here is even though the material belongs to different company code but still it has to be acknowledged for its receipt back into the plant (which was the supplying plant). With 122 I could not map it properly.

 

Here  is the steps I did for the STO:

 

1. Created a intercompany PO --> did VL10d -->did vf01 --> j1iin --> MIGO (101)(wrt to outbound delivery ) --> return delivery 122 via delivery--> in background system generated a delivery with transaction as RLFS. So I see that I have successfully moved out the material from the receiving plant. But it shows in MB5T as open. Now I am unable to  receive the same  in the receiving plant(which is actually the supplying plant).

 

Is there any way I can finish this process by receiving it back to supplying plant?

 

Regards,
J


GR value calculation

$
0
0

Hi guys,

please see the image in attachment and give me your advice related the calculation of GR value in evidence : I have read the OSS Note 518368 point 4 but my calculation does not give the same result...

Before of the GR of my interesting a first GR has been done and then two invoices: the price of first of this invoice  is 7156,8/0,9 = 7952 Eur, the price of the second  is 3578,4/0,3= 11928 Eur and the average is (7952+11928)/2= 9940 Eur and 9940 Eur * 0,6 (qty of my GR to evaluated) = 5964 Eur vs

5566,4 Eur...

Please note that these two invoices have posted a qty of 1,2 pz > PO qty...

 

Thanks in advance

 

BR

 

Massimiliano

storage locations for customers should not be considered in MRP

$
0
0

We are a manufacturing company producing for 2 customers ; All produced products for customer number 1 are stored in our warehouse and reflected in our inventories.

Customer number 2 products are stored in external warehouse and inventory are sold to the customer , therefore inventories are not reflected anymore in our warehouse and stock values for customer number 2 are zero.

Therefore; for all customer # 2 products net requirements are generated and also requirements for materials in FP BOM and they are actually not required.

Also sales and inventory cycles cant be tracked.

My question:

How can we add the customer external storage location for the required products to be able to be linked to our inventories ,therefore no requirements will be generated unless actually required, and in the same time with no impact on our actual inventories (Finance balance sheet)?

 

Subject shortened by: Jürgen L

 

Message was edited by: Jürgen L

Purchase Order Output Determination

$
0
0

Hi,

Is it possible to have PO output determination based on item level / Plant, Storage Location / and if is possible how to define it.

The problem is that we would like to printout PO in different Plants and St.Locations.

payment block in MRBR

$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

one of my user is created a PO and before doing GRN  invoice has been completed after that they completed GRN and problem is when MRBR is used for releasing the invoice for payment  user getting error message voucher blocked for Payment also the same user when different document type been used while creating the PO for the same scenario they can able to release the invoice in MRBR,kindly suggest me what could be the reason and to rectify the block.

 

Thanks

Not able to delete Service line from PO

$
0
0

Dear Expert,

 

I tried to search solution for this issue on SDN but wont found any idea.

 

My issue is, I have service PO with A/C assignment P. I created PO & saved in ME21N. Then with ME22N I am trying to delete the service line. System deletes the line & allow to save the document. But again if open this PO then system shows that line again without WBS element. No deletion flag is set again that line. Due to this I am not able to delete the line in service PO.

 

I am wondering why it is happening. If any one gone through this issue then please give your observation to help me out.

 

 

Thanks & Regards

Subhash P

Need ERS invoice number in Accounting Document

$
0
0

The client wants the ERS invoice number populated in the Assignment (ZUONR) field of the Accounting document.  He wants this done at the time of invoice creation via MRRL.

 

The exit MRMH0001- EXIT_SAPMRMH_001 is not helping, for the invoice is not yet created when the exit is processed. Means, the invoice number is not yet there.

 

Kindly suggest a solution how to take care of this challenge.

 

Thanks in advance

Change GR mov type for inbound delivery

$
0
0

Is there any standard way to influence movement type based on PO document type assigned to inbound delivery? For example, I'd stick with 101 mov type for GR against external PO (NB). But for an STO (UB), I'd want to use custom mov type 901. Doesn't seem possible in config 0VLP but wanted to check.

 

I should add that I need to generate a WM putaway transfer order *before* the GR posting. So any influence over MIGO_GR is too late. I'm trying to influence the movement type that the TO pulls in.

 

Thanks, Vlad


GR valuation on PO

$
0
0

Hi guys,

please see the image in attachment and give me your response: how the GR value in evidence has been calculated?In according to OSS Note 518368 point 4 and 5 : '...If an invoice is already posted, the system use the price of invoice but if a partial invoice is received the partial qty related to invoice is valuated with invoice price, the rest is valuated with PO price.'..but in this case a first GR has done, then two invoices for a qty >PO qty and then another GR....I have thought that the valuation of this GR should have been in according with the average price of the two previous invoices with the product of of this GR qty that is:

price invoice 1: 7156,8/0,9= 7952,8 Eur

price invoice 2: 3578,4/0,3 = 11928 Eur

the average is (7952,8+11928)/2= 9940 Eur but 9440*0,6 = 5664 Eur and not 5566,4 Eur....

Note that before that GR those two invoices have posted a qty of 1,2 > PO qty...

 

Thanks in advance

 

BR

 

Massimiliano

wrong condition types in po

$
0
0

hi all,

wrong pricing procedure is picked in PO and hence the wrong condition types.
i hv created a PO with doc type = import single tender.

Purchasing org = CORG. schema for this purch org = XXX

the vendor in PO has schema grp = 02 (import vendor)

when i go to SPRO - MM- purchasing- conditions - define price determination process- define schema determination -Determine Calculation Schema for Standard Purchase Orders, i can see that for schema for (schema grp vendor= 02) and (schema grp Porg = XXX) is DIMP but in the PO the calculation schema picked is ZABC.

I want to know why calculation schema ZABC is picked instead of DIMP. and how can i rectify this prob?

Batch Where-used Update from STO

$
0
0

I have an issue where STOs for batch managed materials are not updating the batch where-used list upon receipt.

 

When transporting batch managed materials between plants, some receipts do not create a record in the batch where-used table for the receipt (101 movement) at the receiving plant. The result is that a top-down analysis originating in the receiving plant cannot detect the previous records in the supplying plants.

 

System configuration has batch management active at client level, and BWU list is set to update synchronously for all plants.

 

My question is this: What is required for a goods receipt from an STO to update the batch where-used table?

Create a Schedule Line on release of production order

$
0
0

We would like create automatic schedule lines based on Release of Production Orders.

We are getting requsitions, but not sure as how to proceed with those requesitions to do a GR

Have maintained ME31l, but left the ME38 / ME84 empty

 

In routing - Maintained the external operation with Outline agreement #.

Res/ Pur Req = 3 setting

 

and it generates a purchase requsition!

 

Is the Purchase requsition needs to be converted into schedule lines?

ME59 is not picking them up.

 

Any help be appreciated.

How to prevent IM movements to restricted batch status?

$
0
0

I am planning to set up batch status movement to a plant that does not use SAP WM (only IM). Is it possible to disable or prevent certain movement types for restricted batches (ie. GR - 101, 321, 261, etc etc).

 

Appreciate your response.

 

Thanks!

Material master numbering - restrict to 000009999999999999u2013ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have this Issue with material numbering for a specific material type. I have defined external assignment of the following number range:

000099999999999999 u2013 ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

 

I want the business to be able to chose freely from any alpha-numerical sign but i don't want them to enter any number longer than 14 characters. Event though I have maintained the "from"-part of the number range with 14X"9" and the "to"-part with 14X"Z" you can enter any number up to 18 characters.

 

What can be done?

 

Kind regards,

Dag

LE_HU - Movement status of the HU does not allow for archiving

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

I'm using archive object LE_HU for a list of old HU's that were created/assigned to Inbound Deliveries and Outbound Deliveries. My HU's that were created and assigned to Outbound Deliveries were archived successfully. My HU's created and assigned to Inbound Deliveries were not successful and returned with reason 01 - "Movement status of the HU does not allow for archiving". Both HU's have the same MvT Status in table VEKP.

 

I replicated this in our test system and used 2 specific HU's which had the following values:

 

Outbound HU status & values:

Status Profile: HUPACK - Handling Unit Packing Status

System Status: PSTD (Goods Issue Posted)

User Status: ISSD (Handling Unit Goods Issued). Status number 03.

MovmtStatus in VEKP: 0050 - Posted for GI (field VEKP-STATUS)

 

Inbound HU status & values:

Status Profile: HUPACK - Handling Unit Packing Status

System Status: PHEX WHSE (Physically Exists & In Warehouse)

User Status: RCPT (Goods Receipted). Status number 05.

MovmtStatus in VEKP: 0050 - Posted for GI (field VEKP-STATUS)

 

When executing the Pre-process step in object LE_HU, the job displayed my Outbound HU as green (no issues - can be archived) and my Inbound HU as red (Generally cannot be archived) with reason code 01 as mentioned above. I then looked at the Network Graphic for LE_HU to see which objects needed to be archived in sequence. Since we are using an IS-Retail solution, the following objects were relevant for our scenario (in this sequence):

MM_MATBEL - Article Doc

SD_VTTK - Shipment

RV_LIKP - Delivery

LE_HU - Handling Unit

 

For my Outbound HU, it still had the article docs (DC GI & Store GR), shipment and delivery un-archived. This did not affect the HU from being archived. When executing the write step for this HU, it was archived successfully (even with the other objects not archived).

 

For my Inbound HU that appeared with error reason 01, I first archived the related objects successfully (GR Article Doc, Shipment and Delivery). The HU still cannot be archived with same error reason 01.

 

Any ideas why the archive program treats these 2 HU's differently?

What exactly does error reason 01 mean?

What must the Movement Status be for HU's that were/are assigned to Inbound Deliveries?

 

Regards,

Fawaaz


Barcode config for posting GR via MB0A

$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

I have a problem in implementing BARCODE scenario in SAP. Client need to implement barcode scanning while goods move from one location to another. process flow is shown below.

 

 

STO---> VL10G ( Delivery with PO)---> Vl02N ( post goodissue)---> vf01 ( proforma invoice)

 

after these steps barcode ( contains delivery no)  get printed on cartons and move from Location A to Location B. A staff will use RFD device and scan carton to enter it in stock. we are planning to use MB0A tcode for GR. how we can achieve the result.

 

 

Regards

 

Sarath c

Integration of MM reservation with fund management problem

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I'm currently having problems on configuring integration of MM reservation with fund management. I have read note: 1321375 - Materials Reservation MM and Funds Management .

 

And I'm currently testing under SAP ERP 6 EHP 7, with EA-PS 617, make customizing through OMBW and OFUP as suggested, and also customize Integration Scenarios under the Earmarked Funds and Funds Transfers menu in SPRO. When I run the program: RFFMRP_MAT_RESERVATION, there was no error message. But the earmarked funds document is not generated. My questions are:

 

1. What exactly the output of the program RFFMRP_MAT_RESERVATION? Is it suppose to generate earmarked funds document? Because when I execute the program, the text shown was "Document 1000100130 has been changed" while the number 1000100130 is the reservation number. Where can I see the earmarked funds number? (please CMIIW)

 

2. Can the scenario mentioned on note 1321375 - Materials Reservation MM and Funds Management applied eventhough I'm still using former budgeting. or I should first migrate to BCS?

 

Please, please, please suggest.

 

Thank you.

 

Regards,

Raih

Info Record Valid To Date Problem

$
0
0

Hello,

 

We are facing one issue with Info Record.

 

We executed the report "RM06INPO for price update in info record.

Here is the problem, after executing the report to update prices there is difference of valid to date in EINE table and Display Info Record thats ME13.

 

That is if i run this report on 1.01.2011 then valid to date is coming as 01.01.2011 but in display info record ME13 its still the same 31.12.9999.

 

Why there is date difference in table and dispaly of info record. We raised this issue to SAP and got reply also.

But did not able to understand clearly there reply.

 

 

It was wriiten that :

 

Prices (net and effective) are used for the purchasing info record. Usually, the values of the database are used (table EINE, fields NETPR and EFFPR). However, for the display of info records (Transaction ME13), the prices are determined from the current conditions (from the info record) if the Valid to-date (EINE-PRDAT) is in the past. The price determination (for example, for new purchase order items) always accesses the conditions (it therefore never uses the prices of the info record).

 

The status of the prices (database, table EINE) might become obsolete. This is either caused by exceeding the valid to-date or by changed conditions (not with Transaction ME12). For example, you can change the conditions via condition maintenance (for example MEK1), by a currency conversion or by importing COND_A01 IDocs, without the info record prices being adjusted. You can use report RM06INP0 to reset the info record prices

 

Rgds

Himanshu

Checking standard price in previous year

$
0
0

Dear all,

I want to check standard price in previous year via table MBEW but that is difference from MM03 display

Pls see screenshots below:

 

MBEW

10-15-2015 9-16-08 AM.png

 

MM03

10-15-2015 9-09-58 AM.png

 

Could you clarify why they are difference from together?

And is there other way to check this?

 

Thanks,

Quang

list for sub vendor

$
0
0

Hi

 

In ME2N we get a list of Purchase Orders wherein we can trace the Vendors also, suppose in PO in freight condition we maintain different vendor then how can we get the list of those vendors PO wise.

 

Regards

 

Nitin Gupta

Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>