Hi experts,
While comparing RFQ in ME49 transaction, i am getting below error message:
Message no. 06616
I have checked with below note also, in that they have mentioned that ,it is caused by the code from the Note 1043857.
1059878 - Error after the Note 1043857
But in my server the note 1043857 has not been implemented, but still i am getting this error.
Please help me in finding a solution.
Regards
Sankaraditya
Hello SAP Experts,
Is it possible to determine the payment terms in scheduling agreement at item level.
There is one requirement, where user wants different payment terms should be available in scheduling agreement & it should be there at item level. So at the time of MIRO different payment terms can be available for different material.
Please suggest.
Dear All,
I'm new to SAP, and I'm testing some MM process.
I have Created a Purchase requisition trrough Transaction : ME51N
I have Created a Request for Quotation with reference to my Purchase Requisition (to 3 vendors) through Transaction : ME41
I have Created provided prices for each of the three RFQ through transaction : ME47
I have shown the price comparison among the three vendors and check rejection codes for the items that should not be considered.
I have created a Purchase Order through with reference the RFQ I shoosed through transaction ME21N
When go back to my Purchase requisition ME53N, I can see each Line item the Purchase Order that was created as well as the RFQ that I created, all linked to my Purchase Requisition.
My problem now is :
1. I would like not see the RFQ (both those rejected and the ones I accepted) appearing when I create new Purchase orders. I only want to see RFQ where no Purchase Order have been created. This is to avoid users to make mistakes of creating Line Items from wrong (or outdated) RFQ.
2. Is there any report that could show me the line Item, the PR Number, the RFQ it was selected from, the Order Number ?
Best regards,
Dear experts,
I have maintained all settings to able PO generation for a good movement (MMR, Vendor, omjj, ...).
But when i want to do migo against production order with the customized movement type, i'm not able to have Partner tab to add vendor.
Please help!
thanks
Helll All, I have requirement to create a PO with withholding Tax Code. However i don't see an option to enter withholding Tax code in the PO. Kindly guide me as to any configuration that i might be missing in order to create a PO with Withholding tax code . The Withholding Tax type to condition type is not maintained. Do i require to create a new condition type and assign it to withholding tax type ?? You time and help is greatly appreciated Regards Mahesh
Dear Sappers,
With refernce to my previous posted thread, below I am giving the detailed copy of *PERFORMANCE ASSISTANCE*
The Performance Assistance is giving me solution to proceed but for proceeding further is not possible. As max no of sessions are 2.
Also massege is generated by MM02 & solution given is also same MM02.
Please find below pasted Performance assistance.
The base unit of measure cannot be changed; choose "Display errors"
Message no. M3189
Diagnosis
You wanted to change the base unit of measure. However, you can do so only under certain circumstances, including the following:
If there are no stocks of the material in the current period and in the previous period
If there are stocks in the previous period, you can clear them as follows:
a) Post the stock in the previous period to the current period (for example, using movement type 561) so that the stock for the previous period is the same as the stock for the current period.
b) Clear the stock with the posting date in the previous period (for example, using movement type 562).
If no purchase requisitions, purchase orders, or scheduling agreements exist for the material
Procedure
Choose Display errors to see why you cannot change the base unit of measure for this material.
The pushbutton Display errors appears only in dialog mode, not in data transfer or in mass maintenance. If this message appears in data transfer or in mass maintenance, and you want to know why the base unit of measure cannot be changed, access the material in dialog mode using the relevant transaction below, try to change the base unit of measure as required, and then choose Display errors:
Industry
Proceed
Retail
Proceed
Hello Experts,
I am creating PO with my own delivery date but after i press enter it calls inforecord for Material & vendor combination in PO and delivery date in PO will be reset to Inforecord Planned delivery days.
So I don't want inforecord should pep inside the PO (for all PO's what ever i create)
Please guide me how to avoid Inforecord number (FIELD - INFNR) in PO.
Thanks in Advance
Prashanth.v
Hi Experts,
i am facing with a strange problem regarding the output of the PO.
The current set up of our system is - The message output "external send" is set as send immediately(on save operation).
The data which is sent as PDF does not contain the new line items which i have added to the PO, rather it sends the PO data before the change operation.
If i set the dispatch time " Send with periodically Scheduled job" and then make the changes and save. After running program RSNAST00, it sends the correct output with the new record.
The problem: It looks like the data is read from the PO table(EKPO) before the new record is saved into the table, thus showing only the old records when the dispatch time is set as " Send immediately".
Please advice what is the solution for this if i want to retain Send Immediately as Dispatch time.
what is the SAP recommendation for the dispatch time ?
Thanks & Regards,
Tashi
Hi all,
My user requests a report to see inbound delivery against schedule lines.
As per my knowledge, there is no direct relation between delivery and schedule lines.
Do you have any suggestion for this scenario?
We are trying to see whether vendor sent accurate quantities on time, whether he sent less or more, etc...
Thanks.
Hi All,
We want to set a alert for Metal price change in Market by which PO prices can be adjusted and also the Budget.
After several findings in this forum, we found that GAU1 and GAU2 can be used.
As we are using these two condition types for first time we want to know the steps to maintain in SAP.
Also how the prices will be picked from Market. Is it GAU1 gets updated with latest market price or GAU2 and how it gets updated.
Do we have to maintain these condition types in PO directly or not.
Regards,
Sunil Dixit
Hi All,
We have a problem about MIRO accounting document. We create MIRO in USD and then we do reversal posting from MR8M. Exchange rate is same for both document. When we check the documents, we see that, local currencies are same but document currency is different. I searched the forum and I found a thread about same issue but there was no answer. Can anyone help me about this?
Thank you very much
Regards
We have the below business scenario
1. We maintain unique material codes for Bulk and Small packages.
2. Our packing people take bulk product from the warehouse and repack them to small packages.
3. They write how much bulk is consumed and how many small packages are made and this value is not always constant, it varies on the way how packaging people are packing.
4. If 28 units of Bulk material is consumed to prepare 57units of small packages, business want the Moving average price of the small package equal to the value of bulk material consumed
Ex: if 28 units of Bulk material is 56$ then the moving average price of small pack is 56$/57units = 0.982$.
My Advise to the Business is as below:
1. Inventory adjustment using moment type 711 to reduce Bulk and 712 to increase small pack through MB1C
2. Adjust the moving average price manually through MR21.
But business is asking to do a Sub-Contracting PO.
Is my solution easy or is there a better a better solution through sub contracting PO
Regards
Harikrishna
Dear all,
Please how can i customize the system in order to automatically propose PO quantity in the Invoice Verifacation MIRO, even if i've already posted GR ?
Example :
PO Qty = 1000
GR Qty = 900
MIRO should propose 1000 instead of 900.
I've tried with GR based IV option but in vain.
Thanks a lot
Hi experts ,
Actually got a problem regarding sto scenario for a month . Actually , witnessed a huge difference in stock transfer in and stock transfer out quantity ;
For , the previous moths it didn't any type of difference - but for this moth calculation , it has showed big difference ; Why it happened so ?
Just , look at grand total of stock in quantity - 10,099.60 ( column N ) , stock out quantity - 9,963.45 ( column Z) . The difference is near about 136.15 mt.
Hello,
We are in the process of implementing SU management in a warehouse and we will use the same SU number for all goods received together in the same handling unit via Inbound delivery.
At time of creating the Transfer order in LT04 transaction, we assign the handling unit as SU number and SAP determines the destination storage type of the received goods, using the first material.
If the first material goes to Quality inspection, then all materials go to Quality inspection storage type.
If the first material goes to stock, then all materials go to final destination type of the first material.
We would like that, if any of the materials goes to Quality inspection, all materials would go to Quality inspection storage type, as it happens when the first material goes to Quality inspection.
We have not found any user-exit to achieve that.
Has somebody faced the same issue and found a way to solve the issue?
Thanks a lot for your support.
Kind regards.
Chantal Ehret
Hi All,
I would like to active 641-K / 643-K (cross-company) stock transfer including stock determination without activating business function EA-RET (please see OSS note 1619355 as reference). Since we are using a manufacturing system I am concerned of activating EA-RET and impacting something by mistake.
Could you please tell me what options are available? For instance any chance to enable only "SPRO-Logistics - General-Retail Consignment Processing-Activate Retail Consignment Processing"-functionality without the complete EA-RET?
Thank you in advance, best regards Uwe
Dear all
I found that a "closing cockpit" (transaction CLOCO) exists for the FI closings.
I wonder if a similar solution exists for MM/IM/LE ? I have the requirement to start several transactions/programs for the warehouse daily closing in sequence - if there's something SAP standard like the CLOCO, I'd be more than happy 
Thanks for your help in advance.
Best regards,
Kurt
Hi,
There is scenario ; When the material is created the batch management was not activated ; The order had been made - and did the GI with 261 mvt type. But , after couple of days batch management has been activated for this material . Now , the person wanted to do reversal with 262 . during reversal - system asking for batch and when he's going to enter batch number - the field is un-editable .
And when , I tried with a its newly created batch in MSC3N it shows error .
how could i rectify it ?
regards
Patel
Hi expert,
My problem was the wrong calculation of the value linked to the KDM and PRD transaction in the Miro.
The Local currency of company code is EUR . The exchange rate in GR was 0,92285 while the exchange rate in IR was 0,90082.
KBS 492.404,28 USD and 443567,62 EUR
WRX 488.416,22 USD and 450734,91 EUR
PRD 3.988,06 USD and 0,00 EUR
KDM 0,00 USD and 7.167,29 EUR
I don't understand why the system calculate the PRD in Eur equal to zero amount and the KDM in USD equal to zero.
Thank you
Hi,
Client wants that the PO cant be change once it is released.
For this we have maintained Release Indicator Changeability of 1 (i.e. Changeability of Purchasing Document During/After Release cant be changed).
The PO can be changed only if the PO is unreleased. This works properly for POs that are not outputted.
.But for POs that are outputted we are not able to cancel the release. We are using ECC 6.0 Version.
The client also has Version Management activated.
Is there any possibility to link Release Strategy and Version Management without using any User Exit