Hello Experts
When I try to upload data through LSMW (direct input), the system thrown the following error " No Customizing entry defined for period indicator J in logon language".
As per the earlier posting, I checked in O02K about the customization of period indicator wrt language (attached screen shot), all the entries are fine there.
Could anyone guide me on this.
Tnx
We are using stock transfer from non-valuated project stock to valuated project stock with 415 Q mvt.
WBS element 906666-01.02 is non-valuated project stock (in CJ20N)
WBS element 907777-02 is valuated project stock (CJ20N)
when we do MB1B with 415 Q (nonvalauted to valuated) , system is posting the material document.actually it should not post and should display the below error message.
error message: WBS element 906666-01.02 has different inventory valuation
message no:CN769
Please let me know why system is n ot throwing an above error message.?
what are the basic checks need to carry in this case (like in PS/MM)?
Best regards
Pabbati Obulesu
Hi experts,
We encounter this error whenever we attempt to adjust the order qty to a lower qty:
Scenario:
Order qty: 2588 pcs
Delivered (GI): 2202 pcs
Received (GR): 462 pcs
Committed Qty: 2202
Importer would like to change the Original order qty from 2588 to 2202 but cannot proceed due to the error above.
There's no purchase requisition prior this STO.
Question is, is it standard behavior to hinder the changing of qty in the STO when GR qty <> GI qty? We cannot perform full GR yet since goods are not yet at the port.
Regards,
Karen
Hi all,
We have a subcontracting scenario which involve goods with multiple units of measure
The goods have a base unit of measure of boxes with a BOM defined. When they are sent to subcontractor they are loaded on a pallet and sent for the subcon process. There is a standard conversion between boxes and pallets too.
The vendor is always paid for the pallets that is sent. Many a times the vendor is sent a partially filled pallet. In such cases the vendor should be paid for the full pallet. In short, the vendor has to be paid for pallets sent irrespective of the boxes on the pallets.
I tried maintaining a PO with order unit as Pallet and rounded up the PO qty, but it gives an incorrect picture to the planners in MD04.
I have tried to maintain scales but that would mean I maintain scale for every box ordered
eg: if 100 boxes is £100, then the scales would be maintained as
1 box = £100
2 box = £50
3 box = £33.33 and so on
But if I start with this solution, there is no end
Is there a way by which I can order in boxes but the price unit will round up to the next whole number pallet and calculate PO price accordingly
I observed condition type MM00 in the pricing schema. The description of the condition type is Minimum qty (Amount). There are no notes, but can this condition type be used to maintain condition that pallets must be in whole numbers only.
Thanks
Venkat
Hi experts,
How to create inbound delivery automatically during purchase order creation
Thanks&Regards
krishna mohan
I am getting this error , the system is not able to read the data while uploading the excel file in to sap R/3.
Hi everybody
can anyone explain to me what happened exactly when we open the previous period with MMPI T-code in sap ?
in sandbox I Re-opened the previous period(08) and I posted the material document for a material in period 08( in solar calender).
after the post document :
before the post document .
I compare the MCHBH table before and after the post and I didn't see any difference in them?
Dear all,
We have components with unit of measure in pieces. All movements for these components is in whole numbers (without decimal). In some cases the consumption of these components with goods receipt for subcontracting orders is in decimal (movement 543). This movement is automatic with goods receipts 101.
Is there any possibility to prevent 543 movements with decimals?
Thanks in advance
As a std practice, SAP consider movement type 101 and 601 to calculate Cumulative Receipt and Cumulative Issue qty respectively in J_1IRGSUM table. And this happens when user updates the records in RG1 register using T.code J1I5.
i.e. J1I5 -> J_1IRG1 - > J_1IRGSUM
I found that Excise user has been updating RG1 register entries with 261 mvt typeand other mvt types also, with classification type IWO, which is not correct. And then these qtys. are getting added into Cumulative Issue of RG1 summary table.
Now, user is facing difficulty in updating RG1 register as Cumulative Issue Qty. becomes greater than the Cumulative Receipt Qty. in SAP table J_1IRGSUM.
And he has been updating RG1 register with this mvt type 261 since last 6 years.
And now problem is this how to resolve this issue because reversal of RG1 is not possible in SAP.
I read into some blogs about deleting entries directly from J_1IRG1 table but I found that even after deleting the old entries from this table, the same is not getting subtracted from Cumulative Issue qty. of J_1IRGSUM table.
Dear All,
We are facing a situation in respect to a Purchase Order, in which there was goods receipt done in year 2014 , and for that invoice posting (MIRO) was performed in year 2015 . Now there is a credit balance for GR with respect to the PO in 2014 and debit balance in 2015 . How we can knock off the debit and credit balance ?
Thanks and regards
Gitank Sharma
Hello all,
I am facing a problem with acquiring material price from SAP.
I try to get price which is somehow determined when placing new order. I assume this is price from last order.
Firstly I tried to get it from Material Data with BAPI_MATERIAL_GETALL. I am able to get NET_PRICE, which is sometimes empty.
So this is the reason I want the price from the last order.
Secondly I got the price from BAPI_INFORECORD_GETLIST. But then again I get sometimes even more than 20 inforecords. I sorted out all prices which were outdated, but I still get many records. Even the price of this record varies from eg. 0.7€ to 60€ for the same material.
I am using C# and SAP .net connector.
Example:
| Material | InfoR 1 | InfoR 2 | InfoR 3 | InfoR 4 |
| 50802 | 2,7 | 2,8 | ||
| 50818 | 6,4 | 62,83 | 7,65 | 7,88 |
| 50812 | 7,95 | 8,56 | ||
| 197996 |
In the above tabel there are a few lookups for different materials, one has zero inforecords, two have two inforecords and yet another has four inforecords. Those results are already filtered and are shown only valid prices: (purchaseData[i].GetString("PRICE_DATE") == "9999-12-31")
Please help
Dear All,
We have tolerances defined in our system configurations against respective tolerance keys and they work fine. However, we are facing problems with respect to variances created through unplanned delivery costs.
I checked the forum and there are few threads on this topic but none deal with this query.
Example Case -->
We have a PO created for 1 PC quantity and price as 200 USD per PC. There are no other condition types (related to DC) in my PO. I have defined a tolerance limit of 5 USD under PP (price variance) key.
GR is posted for this PO.
When I go to MIRO -->
1) Scenario 1: I enter price 206 USD at line item level. Hence, header level final amount is 206 USD as well and my invoice is blocked as it crosses defined tolerance limit of 5 USD
2) Scenario 2: I enter 200 USD at line item level and I enter 6 USD as unplanned delivery costs (details tab). Hence, header level final amount is 206 USD. However, my invoice is not blocked in this case.
As I understand, after distributing unplanned delivery costs in line items, system does not run a price check again. However, is there any way I can block an invoice if my total amount exceeds the defined tolerance limit in such cases? Can we take into account planned delivery costs affect on total price variance during tolerance checks?
Thanks and Regards,
Ani
Hi GURU,
Is it possible to release service entry sheet free by period for
material?
Is it possible to record them in previous periods of open warehouse?
for example:
my open period now are 4 and 5. I want to post a service entry sheet
in period 3, is it possible? How can i do?
thanks
Hi there,
Please advise. I have a request to create several base unit of measures for a material. Industry is Pharmaceutical.
Eg Goods received 1 x box, each box contains 10 packs of pills. Each pack of pills contains 12 pills. We want to be able to dispense/sell either a pack as well as be able to dispense/sell single pill from the pack.
I am not to familiar on how to set this up, kindly provide the steps.
Thanks in advance
Im trying to use standard radio frequency transaction for <u>Putaway by TO</u> (LM03 *) to change the destination bin for a single-step confirmation TO during confirmation, but I only get <u>Selection not possible</u> message. Is there any functional configuration missing? Any SAP Note?
Steps:
- Enter LM03;
- Check Source Information
- Select Source Information
- Check Destination Information
- Choose <u>F7 NBin</u> (new bin)
- Message <u>Selection not possible</u>
*<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/33/607d5c087b11d3b4ac006094b9b121/frameset.htm">Putaway: Selected by Transfer Order</a>
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Raphael
Dear Experts,
There is a requirement to transfer stock from one material to other,
but the problem is both materials are of different type also the base unit of measure is different.
for example
A is finished material with base unit NO
& B is raw material with base unit KG.
Now i wants to transfer stock of A material to B.
How to proceed for this?
Regards
Lalit
Hello ,
Need differences in these Three t codes on the following parameters :-
1. Business usage
2. Impact in systems
3. Examples to understand the difference.
Thanks in Advance!!
Regards,
Akshaya
Dear SAPERS,
We have one scenario that, fright charges should not loaded on Inventory account for that material (means fright cost should not added to material price when price control is MAP)
I have copied standard FRC1 conditions and added in my pricing procedure and static is marked, in condition accruals also marked.
Account key FRE and Accruals FR1 is given and G/L accounts maintained OBYC for TE keys also, but fright cost is loading to inventory.
Pricing procedure:
15 0 FRB1 Freight (Value) 1 FRE FR1
16 0 ZFB1 Freight (Value) ACME 1 FRE FR1
17 0 FRC1 Freight/Quantity 1 FRE FR1
18 0 ZFC1 Freight/Quty ACME 1 FRE FR1
Account entries at MIGO
ACME 1 89 131000 Inventory - Raw Mat 119.20 USD
ACME 2 96 211200 Goods Received /Invo 109.20- USD
ACME 3 50 217300 Freight Clearing Acc 10.00- USD G/L account assign to FR1 in OBYC
G/L account 217301 is assigned to FRE in OBYC, but no account entries coming here the fright and materials cost is loading to Inventory account 131000.
Please suggest how to post fright cost to FRE account.
Thanks in advance,
Venkat
Edited by: Venkat.mm.sap on Mar 15, 2011 2:13 PM
Hi,
Can we have the stock of material in "Stock in Transit" category for inter-company STOs.
If so what are the steps required.
Thanks
Ashish