Hi ,
I have info record 123 for vendor AB, plant 123 and material MAT123
I have PO created for above combniation
PO 1 date 2013/06/30
2 date 2014/07/3
3
4
5--Latest po 2016/08/09
But when open inforecord and displayed last document. SAP showing po 2 . Home come it is . po should be PO 5 right
Please advise.
Regards
Ram
Please help on this.
In MD04 for certain material.
We have this scenario:
07/05/2016 Purch ord 1 quantity is 6,000
07/07/2016 ShipNT quantity is 2,000
Upon checking, there are 4 outbound deliveries created for PO not yet PGI, total of `8000.
there's inbound delivery with 2k.
Is this the reason why on the PO element, quantity is 6K?
Please explain further. Thanks.
Hi experts,
We encounter this error whenever we attempt to adjust the order qty to a lower qty:
Scenario:
Order qty: 2588 pcs
Delivered (GI): 2202 pcs
Received (GR): 462 pcs
Committed Qty: 2202
Importer would like to change the Original order qty from 2588 to 2202 but cannot proceed due to the error above.
There's no purchase requisition prior this STO.
Question is, is it standard behavior to hinder the changing of qty in the STO when GR qty <> GI qty? We cannot perform full GR yet since goods are not yet at the port.
Regards,
Karen
Hi,
Can anybody help me to understand the below issue.
While doing GR against STO delivery, Getting like "Good movement not possible with mvmt type 161. Our client doing GR against 2004 STO delivery, receiving now and they are facing this issue. Here I am question, system should take 101 movement type only, but how by default its going to 161 return delivery. Please help.
Hi
We have Z functionality developed for producing the end product for this we are calling the BAPI BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to post the goods movement , in this case bapi post mvt type 531 to produce the end product and consume the component of the BOM through 261 mvt.
When i we use FERT material type( as final product) to generate from ROH material (as component ) this functionality works fine , But when we use ROH material type( as final product) to generate from ROH material (as component ) we are getting the error like Create account xxx for xx as a cost element in controlling area xxx message no KI 280.
We don't use CO module.
Can you please explain what i am doing wrong here or there is any need to pass any other parameter in the bapi to post the movements ???
Thanks & Regards
Gaurav
Hello experts
At the time of MIRO, there is a requirement of one additional accounting entry (automatically) say auto run of FB60 where a different (fixed) vendor code will be debited and clearing account GL will get credited. For example, the case is as below-
MIRO entry
PO Vendor Account - 110 (Credit)
GR/IR Account - 100 (Debit)
XYZ clearing account - 10 (Debit)
Additional (Auto) entry required
XYZ clearing account (same as above) - 10 (Credit)
Different Vendor Account - 10 (Debit)
Please suggest how this can be done.
thanks
Hello experts,
Is there any possibility to maintain limit (amount or percentage, for example 20% of total Po line item value) in PO line item so that vendor down payment (advance payment) against PO line item can be restricted to that amount / percentage only. Currently restriction for more than total PO line item is already there.
thanks
Hi Gurus
I´m running MB5B but this option is only configurated in COP , Could I change Layout to show it in USD?
Hello Gurus,
Need your help.
I am getting error message W4080 Costing data exists when I am trying to delete and archive the material .
I already got the option to use SARA with object CO_COPC but my client has not approved to use SARA with object CO_COPC
so wanted to know is there any other way to delete t costing data or any other solution to overcome Error message : W4080
also need more understanding about this issue - is this error because of posting already happened with respect to profit center maintained in costing 1 tab in material master which i am trying to archive or delete?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Samrat
Hi there
Is there a way to view purchase reqs that have been deleted?
I've tried using ME5R but it doesn't seem to show anything.
Hi Gurus,
Batch is maintained in Inbound delivery, but while doing MIGO GR against the Inbound delivery,batch field is showing blank. If this is a standard behaviour, then please suggest an exit for MIGO through which we can copy the batch from Inbound delivery.
Thanks,
AR
Hi,
i will cancel Tcode MB03 (SAP NOTE: 1804812) and only allow user to use MIGO to display a material document.
The user shell not be able to use other possibilities in MIGO.
I try to create a role via PFCG but cannot found any objects for executable Action.
Has anyone an idea which Actions i have to use or have i to create an new Tcode via SPRO for example MIGO_SHOW?
Regards, Dieter
Hello,
we are currently dealing with problems that emerge from the fact that users are ignoring the warning message while putting the serial number profile to material master with stock. I want to prevent them from doing so and force to deal with the stock first so I want to change IO233 to error message. I found out that the message is actually hardcoded in the standard FM MARC_SERNP which is used while checking this:
IF SY-SUBRC = 0 AND
NOT BEST_FLAG IS INITIAL.
CASE P_MESSAGE.
WHEN ' '.
MESSAGE W233(IO).
WHEN 'I'.
MESSAGE I233(IO).
WHEN 'N'.
ENDCASE.
ENDIF.
As this is a standard FM and as they say look before you leap, or think twice before you change the SAP standard, do you have any other idea how to resolve this?
The serial profile has the stock check set to 2 - inconsistency lead to error, however this is probably not affecting the material master handling.
Thank you for your ideas
Hi experts,
Any possibility to routing material to Subcontracting vendor from production order without affecting/hitting inventory GL.
We want to consider the subcontract stock as WIP stock.
As of now, We are performing in 2 steps.
1. Issue to stock from production order using Move.Type 262.
2. Then we are transferring stock to subcontracting vendor using Move.Type 541.
Any suggestions how to handle the situation.
Is there any possibility to copy movement type 262 without creating accounting document just material document?
Hi all,
My requirement is : It is possible to prevent that a specific user reset the release strategy of a Purchase requisition:
Example:
My Purchase requisition has 4 steps of validation, For example X1, X2, X3, X4, and the document is fully released.
So if a specific user that is able to validate the document with the indicator X3, doens't allow to reset the Pr fully released, but it only able to reset the
indicator x3 and not the indicator X1 of the document.
Thank you
Hi All,
Is there an IDOC to update (add, delete etc) Material Characteristic values in SAP? We're currently using IDOC with Message Type CHRMAS to create Material Characteristics.
Say for e.g. we have a characteristic "LENGTH" with 3 values already in SAP and now we need to add 2 more to it. Can we just pass the 2 additional values for the Characteristic through some IDOC and update the data in SAP? OR Is there any recommended way to do this?
Please let me know. Thank you!
Hello Gurus,
I have created new Material type with reference FERT.and also assign LT in QCC0.Now I create material master with material type ZMAT, and create a batch using MSC1N Tcode than message showing..
Message No. 12180
And when changing material type from ZMTP to FERT it is easily creating..
so what is the custom setting where I am missing to create new Material Type..
Thanks & Regards
Azhar Khan
Experts,
I would like to include Total PO Value (Both old and new value), whenever there is a change as part of SAP Workflow.
I am able to get New value from EKPO-EFFWR. Alternatively, i can get condition record no against PO from EKKO-KNUMV and pass it to KONV table. Filter records with KSCHL as PBXX and sum up the value of KWERT column. So far so good.
Challenge: I see that CDHDR and CDPOS entries are not created for object class (EINKBELEG-Purchase order). So i am not sure where from i can get old total PO value.
Please share your valuable inputs.
BR,
Aspire
Hi Experts,
We implemented the User Exit M06B0001 for Code XX: determine the group in workflow responsible for requisition approval.
Requirement:
Based on the Account assignment category in PR for code XX we implement the exit that other code YY (Accounting group) should able to release.
Means one release code level two different depts were present. They need to approve the PR individually based on the account objects.
From configuration level done the changes
E.g. Release Group ZZ.
Step 1: Workflow setting should be changed from 1 to 9 (Release code XX)
Step 2: New release code XX should defined for the Release group ZZ as below combination
ZZ YY 1 Accounting group
Step 3: New Agent Ids should maintained for Code XX & Group ZZ
Result:
We written the logic for code XX based on Accounting assignment check.the processor is updated with Accounting group (New code YY)
Question:
If we implement the EXIT M06B0001 is it possible to update the CODE XX to YY at Purchase requisition level (While display) or only processor will updated and only agents were updated at workflow ?
Or is there any other EXIT to update code XX to Code YY at PR level.
Challenge here is the code XX for particular release strategy was not updating while creation or change of PR only agents for workflow were updating for PR.
Coming to Roles - Code XX should not release the PRs having the processor as Accounting group.
Role defined for code XX: Z_BANF_RELEASE_XX & code YY : Z_BANF_RELEASE_YY
The users having authorization for code YY cant able to release the PR based on the processor in PR. It refers only code XX (Because in PR only code XX was displayed after implement the EXIT as well)
Other challenge is code XX users (Z_BANF_RELEASE_XX) can release XX as well as code YY (accounting group). There was no restriction for code XX users( Actual action is for Accounting group, YY).
So please let me know how we can achieve this at Roles perspective. Or is there any way (EXIT) to update code XX to YY.
Other alternate solutions appreciated please.
Thanks in advance.
Dear All,
I copied an existing header condition type, but when I go to ME21, its not coming in header conditions. Am I missing anything else.
Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Shyam.