Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

GI against reservation

April 8, 2014, 10:32 pm
$
0
0


Dear All,

 

I am facing some issue during GI document against reservation. Our client has created one GI doc against reservation. On same date, another document was created with same reservation number because of which the quantity becomes negative. When we have a view at the documents and compared with other documents, In reservation tab, withdrawl quantity was not updated in both the documents where as when we post GI doc this field gets updated and also system does not allow to post two GI doc against same reservation number.

Please help me, why system has not updated withdrawl quantity for this document.

Any note or any transaction code, where we can see what when wrong during that period.

 

Regards,

Priti.

↧
Search

Change item category of BOM component

April 8, 2014, 11:43 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Our user wanted to change the item category for BOM components through transaction IB12 using LSMW.Wanted to confirm whether it is possible to change item categoryof BOM component from "N" to "L" through LSMW.What exactly will be effected because of this change?And the steps to change the item category from "N" to "L" for the list of BOM component using LSMW.

 

Request your valuable thoughts.

 

Thank you in advance,

 

Regards,

Rubina Rahman

↧
↧

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create a material document for consumable goods

April 6, 2014, 10:06 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

 

I am using a BAPi  (BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE) to create a material document using a PO. Please note that the PO contain no material number. It contains short text. The account assignment is being copied in to the MIGO from PO (when i am doing the process manually without BAPI). But when i am using the BAPI at that time i am getting an error as:

 

E M7                   036 No goods receipt possible for purchase order 45XXXXXXXXXX 00010 .

 

Logically this should not happen as  when i do it manually i am able to post MIGO.

 

Under goods movement header i am giving :

 

posting date

doc date

text

 

goods movement code :

01

 

GOODSMVT_ITEM

 

plant

mov type

po number

vendor

line item

short text

cost cenrtre

order no(int ord no)

mov indicator: B

 

GL account

base unit of measure

 

 

Where i am going wrong?

↧

Creating Scheduling Agreements via BAPI

April 9, 2014, 12:30 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

I am developing an application which has to create Contracts & Scheduling Agreements as part of a workflow process.

 

Now I was sincerely believing that BAPI_SAG_CREATE will help me with that unitll I came across the the deadly error,


"Scheduling agreements withtime-independent conditions are not supported"

 

When I did some research and read the forum, I came across the SAP Note,1046794, which says the following

 

"Question:

You want to change a scheduling agreement via BAPI_SAG_CHANGE and

receive the error message MEOUT019: "Scheduling agreements with

time-independent conditions are not supported". Why?

 

Answer:

BAPI_SAG_CHANGE (and BAPI_SAG_CREATE) can only treat scheduling

agreements with time-dependent conditions. Document conditions are not

supported. Therefore, this kind of scheduling agreements cannot be

processed. This is a missing functionality "

 

My problem is, I want to create a Time- Independent Scheduling Agreement programatically. Since the above BAPI is of no use, how can I do it?

 

Is BDC the only option?

↧

Error in PO

November 19, 2008, 10:21 pm
$
0
0

Dear All,

 

Our client is getting a error wnhen saving a PO.

 

Processing state 01(Version in Process) does not allow processing of this follow-on document

Message no. MEPO814

 

Diagnosis

You have attempted to create or process a follow-on document to purchase requisition , item , with the processing state 01(Version in Process). This is not possible.

 

 

Procedure

Depending on the processing state and system settings the following must apply to the purchase requisition:

 

The current version must have been completed

The release process must have been completed

 

How to go with this?

 

Regards

↧
↧

Fax printing one page more than 8 times

April 9, 2014, 10:52 pm
$
0
0


Hi,

One of supplier complained that when ever they receive RFQ from us,the first page of RFQ is gettting printed more than 8 times.Is it some problem from supplier side or from our configuration side? Can some one throw light on this issue,please? Thank you.

 

With Regards,

Jaheer

↧

Material Analysis reports not picking material issues in new SLOC

April 9, 2014, 4:31 pm
$
0
0

MC.9 /MC.2 reports on the number of issues and reciepts per storage location and valuation.

 

We have new storage locations for which when we run Mc.9/Mc.2 for 601 (issues to sales) and 641 (issues to STO) movement types, it doesn't show the consumption or goods issue. Note: it only consider 261 as an issue and thats it.

 

However for same movement types and old storage locations, it calculates issues correctly.

 

 

Just wondering, have I missed any link or config when new storage locations were created  so that it is captured by analysis reports

 

This is MB51 of new storage location

mb51.PNG

 

MC.9/Mc.3 only picks 261 in reporting and leaves rest for this sloc only.

↧

Different Stock shows in MBLB and MM03.

April 9, 2014, 1:43 am
$
0
0

I have found a problem in my system,

I have the stock quantity and value for vendor for the material WFLM.

I can see the stock in MBLB.

ScreenShot.jpg

Here you can see, system shows the stock quantity 489.625 and value 4,896.25.

But I can see the different stock and value in MM03,

ScreenShot.jpg

Here you can see the total stock and value shows as 287.425 and 2874.25.

How can it be ? How can MM03 shows the lower stock from MBLB ?

I haven't any stock in MB52 (Godown).

↧
Search

Solution For Using External Service - Client in Dubai

April 6, 2014, 8:49 pm
$
0
0

Dear All,

 

Kindly provide a suitable solution for this scenario.In this company, Water Production has RO Plants and WELLS.

 

Incase of WELLS, the payment of this contract is  done only if it reached Dhs.50,000 ie. after 25 wells are repaired.

 

Usually Engineers they note the date of maintenance and make work order. They then select external service and once the PR is generated automatically they stop the procedure. Because if they do SES then they have to do 25 SES to reach Dhs 50,000 which is practically not possible.

 

So what is the solution-

 

Is it possible to club the 25 Work orders (2000*25=50000) so that 1 PR can be generated automatically to make 1 PO and then 1 SES . So as per contract Finance can pay the vendor 50000.

↧
↧

Planned Order No. Reference in PR

April 9, 2014, 11:19 pm
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I want to find the planned order number in the PR generated converting a planned order manually. I searched for the answer but could not find the correct answer. Pls, help me..

 

Regards,

Karteek.

↧

Still to be deliver value is different from total PO value

April 9, 2014, 11:46 pm
$
0
0

Hello Team ,

 

I have observed that even there is no any GR happen for line items , the value at header level, still to be delivery value is varies from total PO value .

 

I have cross checked with line item wise the value with total Header value. Its matching . However, there is no any PO history for any line item as its fresh PO. But the Still to be delivery value is less than PO Value.

 

Can anybody help me understanding why this is shows deference ?

 

 

Regards

Ganeshan

↧

GR Picked the price from Inforecord instead of PO

April 9, 2014, 9:49 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have the following issue which i could not understand why occurring

In the info record we maintained netprice 5.80 EURO ,while put a PO manually we changed net value as 6 EURO .but while doing GR system

took 5.8 euro-info record price instead of p.o price.

 

price control indicator is 1-purchase order, is there any thing to look into know why and how system fetched info record price instead of p.o .

 

thanks

↧

Back posting only possible with same valuation class

April 10, 2014, 12:26 am
$
0
0

Hii, I made changes in valuation class before that i closed all the open po and maintained stock zero using 201 mvt type on 31st March. Now the system is throwing error when Im doing the reversal using MB1A 202 mvt type like "Back posting only possible with same valuation class". But its taking if I take the Posting date to 1st April, and we want to post on the 31st MArch. Please provide the suggestion.

 

Thanks,

Manoj

↧
↧

Incorrect release value calculation in release PO

April 10, 2014, 12:01 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

There is 1000 dollar total target value in contract.  Say 900 dollar released already through 2 Purchase Orders. 


PO1 - 400 dollar - delivery completed. 
PO2 - 500 dollar - delivery completed.

 

Now I want more quantity worth 50 dollar.  When I change the quantity in PO2 and bring it to say 550 dollar, then system shows error "Target value of contract XXX exceeded by 450 dollar".  I do not expect the error because effectively i am just increasing 50 dollar value which means 400 + 500 + 50 = 950, still lower than target value 1000. Basically when I change the value, system considers the whole PO as new PO and calculates release values.

 

I noticed "Delivery Completed" is ticked in PO item.  My theory is that Delivery Completion Indicator is the culprit.  I  unticked it in ME22N.  Still at the table EKPO-ELIKZ there is X. 

 

I understand I can create a fresh PO for the 50 dollar requirement.  Alternatively will I be able to use PO2 somehow ?

 

Cheers.

↧

MRN9 issue

April 10, 2014, 10:12 pm
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

The summary as appearing in MRN9 does not match with the Stock value appearing in F.01(i.e. Financial statement)

 

The details are as follows as on 31/3/14

 

Plant

GL

Amount as per f.01 (BS)

Amount as per MRN9

Difference

GPET

133000

35,40,626

35,42,524

-1897

 

The breakup of the above difference are attached in the file, which are (Doc type: WA) Goods issue entries.

 

Can you please go through the same and revert me back how consumable entry passed when there is no stock.

↧
Search

Vendor code is updating wrongly in batch master

April 10, 2014, 10:13 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

 

       Batch master is not getting updated with the vendor present in material document. Please find the screenshot. In the material doc vendor code is 30761 and batch master is updated with 30541.

 

 

 

Regards

Badri

↧

Allowing price changes at Service Entry

April 8, 2014, 1:14 pm
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have the following scenario at hand in service procurement (ESM):

 

 

In the PO for a Guarding-services we stipulate that 1 month costs 150.000 CLP of this service. (1 UN = 150.000 CLP)

Upon doing the SES - entrance of the activities for the month of guarding we want to be able to lower o elevate the prcie for the month of service depending on the days the guard did not shoew for work or in the month put in some extra hours.

(1 UN = 120.000 or 1 UN 180.000 CLP)

 

The checkbox "allowing Price changes at the time of entry sheet" is visible in the SES as well as in the PO service line buy not open to be marked!

Where do I have to configure this option? Or does the availability of marking this checkbox depend on other criteria?

 

Thanks for any help.

 

Aart

↧
↧

PO Print Output Message Automatically Without Maintaing Condition Record

April 10, 2014, 10:15 pm
$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

User have the Requirement When Any New Vendor Create in SAP System Automatically Printout When they Create PO Without Maintaining Condition Record throgh T-Code MN04.It Possible throgh Config Side or Need to Take help of ABAP Team.

 

Please help.

 

Thanks

Praveen-Yadav

↧

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create a material document for consumable goods

April 6, 2014, 10:06 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

 

I am using a BAPi  (BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE) to create a material document using a PO. Please note that the PO contain no material number. It contains short text. The account assignment is being copied in to the MIGO from PO (when i am doing the process manually without BAPI). But when i am using the BAPI at that time i am getting an error as:

 

E M7                   036 No goods receipt possible for purchase order 45XXXXXXXXXX 00010 .

 

Logically this should not happen as  when i do it manually i am able to post MIGO.

 

Under goods movement header i am giving :

 

posting date

doc date

text

 

goods movement code :

01

 

GOODSMVT_ITEM

 

plant

mov type

po number

vendor

line item

short text

cost cenrtre

order no(int ord no)

mov indicator: B

 

GL account

base unit of measure

 

 

Where i am going wrong?

↧

MRBR - Specific authorization check on Automatic release (vs Manual)

April 10, 2014, 7:04 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

 

Within the company we have people who are dedicated to entering and booking of vendor invoices. In the case an invoice is blocked by SAP for payment they will also address the problem by notifying the person responsible. This first groep are Invoice clerks.

Another group of people are allowed to overrule the payment blocks set by SAP => manual release in MRBR). This second group are called Payment Authorizers.

Invoice clerks should have no authorization to release invoices manually in MRBR, an automatic release of invoices is allowed by invoice clerks (in that case it is not actually the invoice clerk, but SAP that detemines the right value for the payment block).

 

My main question is: can I authorize the invoice clerks for automatic release, but not for manual release in MRBR?

 

The Invoice clerks works in a WF and the WF only ends when the invoice is released for payment.

In the WF we have built a work item that triggers RM08release with the explicit selection on 'Automatic' and the invoice number the WF item is related to. That WF item now shows an error, because the user does not have the correct authorizations.

 

relevant authorization objects are:

M_RECH_SPG

M_RECH_EKG

???

 

Any suggestions are welcome.

 

thanks in advance,

 

Noud

 

p.s. RM08RELEASE also runs nightly, but being able to release the blocked invoice  at the time the cause of the block is resolved, is preferred.

↧
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>