Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live

Mass update of Third Party Vendor at PO Line item pricing condition

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We have requirement from business as follows:

 

We are using item level condition for Lumper Charge in PO and it is for Third Party Vendor. We maintain vendor in pricing condition record so it will be automatically populated while PO is created. Recently vendor is changed so we have also updated new vendor in pricing condition record so it will be taken care when new POs will be created. But there are thousand open POs in which new vendor needs to be updated.

 

Is there any way to mass update third party vendor at PO line item level?

 

Relevant pointers will be rewarded.

 

Regards,

Tt


Print title for document

$
0
0

Hello gurus,

 

I would like to get out of MM document printing, the name of the title text refering to the text I included.

Ex: I filled a date in the "warranties" field text in a PO and I want to be printed not only this date, but also "warranties" as a title of this date.

 

I noticed one customizing setting to allow this: MM/Purchasing/Messages/Texts for messages/ Define texts for PO/Texts for document supplement/Details for warranties for standard PO: there is one "Print Title" flag I selected.

 

Anyway, this does not work and I do not have this title on my printing document.

 

Do I miss something? Could you please help me?

 

Thanks in advance.

Stock in Transit in current period for already discontinued material

$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

I have an issue where i could see Stock in transit is there in MMBE and MAterial master plant view but is not there in MB5T.

 

Also, i saw that material is in discontinued state from 2013.. and hence i could not see any material document with year 2014.

 

But i have Stock in transit shown in the current period.

 

Could you please help me to check that how we can have that??

 

Also, i have already gone through other blogs..but found nothing..

 

Thanks

Neha

Enter goods receipts for vendor .... only (Message no. M7107)

$
0
0

Dear all,

 

I know there are postings on this topic but I was unable to find the information I need.

We have designed a process whereby we issue some goods (slices, for example) directly to the DC (3PL) which distributes them subsequently to the stores.

We do this with the two-step stock transfer (we create an STO, do the GI with movement type 351 and the DC does the GR whereupon we receive the data file via the interface and a program converts and creates an IDoc for GR with movement type 101).

We get the error status of the inbound IDoc after the GR takes place at the DC. However, if we are to perform a manual GR with MIGO, it works.

What goes wrong in this process?

Thank you in advance for your valuable input!

 

Regards,

Miro

Rounding profile ignored in MRP

$
0
0

Dear gurus,

 

we have a poblem concerning MRP and Rounding Profile:

 

We have a material with a Rounding Profile supposed to round up to full purchasing units. Purchasing unit is PAK = 200 pcs.

When we simulate this rounding profile in OWD1, it works just as expected for that material:

 

From qty [PC]     To Qty [PC]     Rounded Qty – Units [PC]

1                       200                    200

201                   400                     400

401                   401                     600

 

So far, so good.

 

Now, in the material master the MRP setting are: Reorder Point 100, Lot size “Replenish to maximum stock level” and maximum stock level is 400, Rounding profile as described above.

 

So, when we start MRP, we would expect the system to calculate an amount of 350 pcs and then round up to 400 pcs or down to 200 pcs (because if 400 pcs were delivered, the maximum stock level would be exceeded).

 

But instead, a PR with 350 pcs is created.

 

Why is this? Does SAP ignore the rounding profile when using lot size “Replenish to maximum stock level”?

 

Cheers Alicia

Conditions on a PIR

$
0
0

Good day

 

Could you please advise if it makes a difference how the sequence of the conditions on a PIR are listed in getting to the Effective Price.

 

Please see the screenhots below an example of two materials with the same pricing conditions but the Effective Price is differed.  How can we fix this?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Regards

 

Maria

Default Material Group based on PO Doc Type

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

Is there any standard configuration available to default Material Group in PO based on Document Type. I checked the forum, one of the earlier posts is suggesting Enhancement, but I am looking for Configuration.

I cannot use IMG--> Materials Management --> External Services Management --> Source Determination and Default Values --> for Purchasing Organizations, since it is already used by Freight team.

 

Please advise.

 

Manish

MR11 GR/IR Clearing Account Maintenance

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

Can anyone help me in understanding GR/IR clearing account maintanence,i do understand in case to nullify any negative balances we go for it, but want to know in details and when we do it for company code what is the impact it does have on accounts.

 

Thanks and Regards,

Sathya kumar.


how to delete the account maintenance document created

$
0
0

Hello Sap Experts,

 

I have a Purchase Order, posted for goods reciet and invocie were also done then there is an "AccM" document that apperared. I want to check who made this. Then when i click the document it is leading to MR11SHOW tcode..How can i cancel the document?How is it triggered also?

 

Thanks for the help!

Update pricing in ME32K

$
0
0

HI All,

 

In ME33K we have an option to do the price simulation but same thing is not available in ME32K.

 

When we try to check in ME32K that option is not available.

 

Ideally we entered wrong schema group in vendor master and same got picked(pricing procedure) in contract. Now we had corrected the vendor master but no option to update the same in contract.

 

Please let me know if there is any option to correct the same in contract.

 

We dont want to go to purchase order as it gets created automatically and no option to modify the same manually.

 

 

Regards,

Umesh

reversing a reversal document.

$
0
0

Hi gurus,

             I've reversed a GR/IR clearing document and it cretaed a reversal document.now if i want to rverse the reversal document to bring the reversal document back into affect.Is it possible to do it.(or) Is it to be done maually.I am new to this kind of stuff . if it is manual adjustment what are the steps that are to be done .

Can someone please help me how to do  this .I'd appreciate your help.

 

Thanks

Chris T

Radio Frequency

$
0
0

Has anyone had any experience with sending messages from SAP to the users of the RF devices, such as hand held and truck mount devices.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

Update MSEG-GRUND on existing Material Document

$
0
0

Hello All,

I have a request from business asking for the ability to go back into a Material Document (MB02 or something similar) to 'correct' the reason code that was assigned at the time of posting the document.  I know this field currently cannot be changed after the fact and I understand the reasons why.  My standard response would be to cancel the material document and then re-post with the correct reason code.   

 

Can someone please provide me with good reasons why we should not explore the possibility of developing a custom routine that would allow the update of reason code on existing material document?  I am looking for this so I can go back to the Business and convince them this is not the way to go.
 

Thanks in advance.

Stock to Stock Transfer (Changing Batch Number)

$
0
0


Occasionally we need to "correct" a batch number.  Most often because the user let the system assign an auto Batch Number instead of using our site procedure to create a "Smart" Batch Number (i.e. MMYYYYXXXXX).  We correct this by executing the MIGO Transfer Posting, Other, Movement Code 301.  This works for us, but is there some display screen that could be transacted, and them printed so it could be included in our Batch History Files?  This print out would need to show the "OLD" and "NEW" Batch Numbers.

BOM: particular subcontracting materials. Help!

$
0
0

hi everybody.
We are dealing with a rare issue concerning the Bill of materials and the material master.

common subcontracting codes have this structure:

 

code : AB1 --> procurement type: F30 (subcontracting)

the bom contains the code AB2--> procurement type : F (buy)

 

when we purchase the code AB1, the system inserts automatically code AB2 in the PO and generates need in the mrp

 

BUT we have some codes which have another structure:

code : AB1 --> procurement type: F30 (subcontracting)

The bom contains:

1) code AB2 --> procurement type : F (buy) when we purchase the code AB1, the system inserts automatically code AB2 in the PO and generates need in the mrp

2) code AB3

3) code AB4

4) code AB5

 

We want code AB2 to be sent to the supplier as material to be worked, but WE DO NOT WANT the mrp to process code AB3 AB4 AB5 (which are supplied by the supplier and not by us)

 

The easiest way of dealing with this issue would be to cut codes AB3 AB4 AB5 from the bom, but WE NEED TO KEEP THOSE CODES in the bom, to keep history of the composition of the materials and to be able to repair possible broken materials.

 

 

Do you know if there is any way to tell to the mrp to avoid to process codes AB3 AB4 AB5? is there any box in the bom which we can thick?

 

Thanks in advance for your help

 

 

Arianna


Release Strategy Revokes Automatically After MIGO Exit.

$
0
0

Dear Experts, Facing A strange issue in PO Release strategy. After Releasing PO, Tried to do MIGO. Due to some reason, exited from migo transaction without posting. After some time again tried to make MIGO and observed release revoked. After a lot of testing identified its revoking by MIGO once exit without posting. Is this a standard behavior? How do i stop this? Reg, BHG.

Disable address details in ME21N/ME22N

$
0
0

Dear gurus,

 

in ME21N/ME22N on tab delivery address I can maintain an address no. in field Address to “load” a master data address from ADRC. But after that I can still klick on Address details and change the previously loaded address so that a new address is created in ADRC when the PO is saved.

 

Now we are looking for a way to deactivate the button Address details when an address number is maintained in field address, so that the user cannot change a loaded address.

 

Any ideas how to do this?

 

Cheers

Alicia

Application area MM

$
0
0

Experts,

 

I want to maintain an entry in table T160M for message MM081 with category as 'E'. Purpose is to convert warning message in Tcode MM02 as Error.

 

I can see view V_160M exists. When i try to maintain entry in this table i see that application area MM is not found.


Please let me know how to maintain entry ''MM" for application area.

 

BR,

Aspire

How to List specific STO lines Pending for GR

$
0
0

Is there any way to list specific STO lines pending for GR. I can use ME2N to list all lines, but I need only specific lines to be listed.

 

In my process we have STO with multiple outbound deliveries. DC can dispatch goods on deliveries separately. So basically I want to limit my list of STO's wrt to outbound delivery number.

 

Let me know if I am not clear on my requirement or if you need more details.

 

Thanks

 

PS. I have used EKBE table to list all the STO lines (with reference field as outbound delivery) and used excel to filter out all STO lines without GR, but I have very huge data and its very time consuming. I am wondering if there is any better way to do that.

Printout of change will be sent automaticly

$
0
0

Dear all,

 

I've got a question regarding message determination, especially the ouput of messages for contracts after changes.

Our business has to maintain old purchase orders and contracts. The most of the changes are fields relevant to printout of changes.

Normally the changes generate a new message, but it will not sent automaticly. (Send with periodically scheduled job)

Only the first message after creating and saving the printout will sent automaticly to the vendor. (only a new one)

Now we have a problem with some contracts, which were created a few years ago. There were no messages in the output history of the contract. After extending the validity end date and after saving, a new message was generated. And because it was the first message in the output history of the contract,  was it sent automaticly to the vendor.

How can I avoid such cases in future, because the business need to maintain many contracts and it is very tediously to change the dispatch time for all contracts.

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Best regards

-dd

Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>