Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

How to remove Phantom materials from Sub contracting PO printout

May 23, 2013, 6:39 am
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

 

                         For a sub contracting Material , for its BOM i have included 3 "Phantom Assembly Materials", Under these phantom materials we have few components which will be supplied for vendor for sub contracting process. Issue is while taking the Sub contracting PO print out in ME23N, these Phantom materials are appearing in the print out, for us these phantom materials should not appear in the Printout only the actual components which we supply for vendor should appear. Please provide the suggestion how to remove the phantom materials from the PO print out.

 

 

 

Kindly provide your valuable suggestions

 

J.Balakrishnan

↧
Search

purchase requisition

May 23, 2013, 8:25 pm
$
0
0

Hello Gurus!!

 

When i try to convert the Purchaser Req to PO in MD04 tcode, by default system is selecting the PO doc type as EUB. Is there any way we can default in to a different PO document type? Also, can we default the PO doc type (During PR conversion) by material type?

Reason is we have two material types and we are using two different document types, because one material type needs a delivery document and other doesn't.

 

Thank you..

↧
↧

Physical inventory stock

May 22, 2013, 10:05 pm
$
0
0

Hi Friends,

 

When we have taken physical inventory book qty given by the system on 17.04.2013 was 95162.86 kg. This qty is before doing inventory posting.

 

But when we check MB5B report balance before taking physical inventory was 137162.862 kg ( I get arrived on this qty by taking opening balance & doing + & - for the material qty.)

 

Following is the MB5B report.

MB5B.jpg

 

Below is the calculation I have done in excel.  I get arrived on this qty by taking opening balance & doing + & - for the material qty.

 

Excel calculation.jpg

 

Thanks,

Kiran

↧

How to assign vendor to condition type by default?

January 4, 2012, 1:23 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Here one import PO is having more than 100 line items and for each condition type different, different vendor has to be assigned.

 

Is there any way to make it default before only like all custom duty conditions belong to one custom clearing vendor only all the time, so that each and every time they need not assign it manually..

 

How to do it pls let me know..

 

regards,

Sanjana

↧

PO delivery schedule

May 11, 2009, 1:16 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I'd like to adapt in the PO item details delivery schedule (SAPLMEGUI - TC_1320) the displayed fields. If i go there to table settings/administrator/ i can see the current settings. Some fields are marked as invisible. E.G. quantity commited, issued and deliverd.

 

1. I'd like to display those, but if i uncheck the box, press activate and save - nothing changes.

 

2. How do i influence quantity commited, issued, and delivered?

 

Thank you for you help.

 

Best regards, Paul.

↧
↧

MIRO is showing cumulative freight value

May 24, 2013, 7:21 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Multiple Goods receipt are done for PO line item.

While doing MIRO the freight value cumulates for both the GR's.

The client requirement is that the freight value should show seperately with reference to each GR during MIRO.

 

Regards,

Pratap.

↧

transfer quantities from one material code to another without changing MAP (Moving Average Price)

May 23, 2013, 7:13 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Stores need to transfer quantities from one material code to another, however we cannot use movement type 309 – as this was creating negative implications on the moving average price. In other words we do not want the average price to change.

 

 

The effect we need is the below:

 

 

Material 1 – Qty 20 @Eur10 =Eur200

Decrease qty 1 @Eur10 =Eur10

 

 

Material 2 – Qty30 @Eur5 =Eur150

Increase qty 1 @Eur5 =Eur5

 



Any help is appreciated. we are stuck.

 

Thanks

↧

In Framework PO PO history not updated

May 18, 2013, 9:00 am
$
0
0

Hi

In Framework PO with account assignment U & Item Category B, PO history not updated though we booked MIRO against that PO, also unlimited MIRO allowed,

Kindly revert if i am missing somewhere

 

Regards

 

Subject was edited by: Jürgen L

↧
Search

Route Planning in SAP

May 25, 2013, 9:31 am
$
0
0

Hi Sap Gurus,

 

 

Right now we need to optimize our logistics delivery system.

So we are looking for a Route Planning based in the weight of our merchandise.

 

What is the tool in SAP we can use to do this?

What others aplications can i use?

 

 

Thank you and Best Regards

 

             João Fernandes

↧
↧

BAPI_PO_CREATE1 Inconsitant Pricing for Multiple Schedules

March 12, 2013, 10:13 am
$
0
0

Hello All,

  We are using BAPI_PO_CREATE1 using an RFC call from a 3rd party web based portal. It was working nicely until after we upgraded to ECC6.0  andthen we  we first noticed a problem with the PO price in certain situations about 6 months after the upgrade.

    The BAPI works fine probaby 99.9% of the time but under certain conditions it either gives an error (Net Price Must Be > 0) or it creates the PO with an incorrect price.

  The problems occur if we have a purchase order with multiple schedule releases on it.  The other piece to the puzzle is that it only seems to happen when the price of the material is less than 0.002 each. 

  So I have a price from my supplier being passed into the BAPI.  If the price is > .0.002 then all is well if I have a single schedule or multiple schedules to be created by the BAPI.  If the price is < 0.002 AND I have multiple schedules then one of two things happens.

  A.  If an info record exists in SAP for the vendor then the PO is created but uses the info record price instead of the price I am passing into the BAPI.  The info record price can be < 0.002  and it will work. 

  B.  If no info record exists in SAP for the vendor, the PO is not created and gives the error Net Price Must Be > 0. 

We did apply OSS note 1637916 but that did nothing. 

Has anyone else come across this problem?  I would very much appreciate any input. 

Thanks!

↧

Nonstock Materials

July 4, 2008, 8:28 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

Can we create material master of non stock materials and services? If yes what views are essential and what views of material master cannot be used in case of these materials.

 

Regards,

Kumar

↧

due date in purchase order

May 25, 2013, 11:27 am
$
0
0

In purchase order I cannot see the due date... I can' find the payment processing tab.

1) HOw can I activate it?

2) Is the due date in the payment processing the due date of the vendor invoice?

Thanks a lot....

↧

Creation of PO for FERT Material master without purchasing view.

May 25, 2013, 12:32 am
$
0
0

Respected experts,

 

I have a situation, at my client no Purchasing view selected for Material type FERT in OMS2 settings, still we are able to create PO for FERT material.

 

System only issues following information message

 

Material ### mainly procured internally (please check your input)

Message no. ME092

 

As per my understanding system should give error message for maintaining Purchasing view for material master(Message No ME046).

 

Please explain me how this is possible. I search this message number but not found anywhere in system.

 

Please guide.

 

Regards

Subhash P.

↧
↧

Legal and fiscal requirements Direct and Indirect purchasing

May 25, 2013, 11:31 am
$
0
0

Dear all

I would like to know the formal SAP documents regarding country specific legal and fiscal requirements for Direct and Indirect purchasing in MM for a pharmaceutical company.

For example what are the Instrastat requirements for countries such as The Netherlands, Germany, Ireland etc., what are the required input taxes (tax codes) for each country etc.?

 

Could somebody please tell me where to look at? Ideally I am looking for a document which describes the necessay configuration/customizing needed in MM. Thanks in advance.

↧

Error in Vendor Evaluation Process

May 25, 2013, 9:54 pm
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

I am facing problem in vendor evaluation process. My main concern area is Delivery criteria where I am getting error.

 

The below IMG setting has been done for my test case.

- Best Score: 100

- Applicability Period: 200

- StdDelVar. : 100

- MinDelVar. : 10

- Indicator for "Min. Deliv. Qty/Std Value Deliv. Time Variance" has been set

- Timeliness/Service: 0.2

- Main criteria: Quality & Delivery (automatic calculation)

- Sub-criteria: Quality: GR Inspection Lot weight 100; Delivery: On-Time Delivery weight 100

- Unequal weighting method: Quality- 70% & Delivery- 30%

- "Points Scores for the Automatic Criteria" are standard

Also, I have update the period unit of S013 (updating control) from 'M' to 'D'.

 

Now, my questions are-

1. my result for "On-Time Delivery" are coming wrong or absent in ME61 even though PO and GR done. means the score are not coming as per the standard score given against percentage variance for On-Time Delivery in "Points Scores for the Automatic Criteria". why the result is wrong or absent?

2. if Indicator for "Min. Deliv. Qty/Std Value Deliv. Time Variance" are not set what will happen? here mentionable that we are not maintained minimum delivery percentage and the standardizing value for delivery time  variance in material master record.

3. What is the impact of 'D''. when it will update the statistics.

4. in ME65 Ranking List report, I need to know the function of a field name- "Av. Variance". how the result is calculated for this field?

 

Waiting for a helpful response.

 

Regards,

 

Md. Saidur Rahman

↧
Search

mb52 stock and mb5b stock not matching

November 15, 2012, 8:15 pm
$
0
0

hi,

 

We run two reports for tally the stock in warehouse but MB52 stock and MB5B stock not matching each other...?

 

why is that so.... for same period we are running the report.

 

 

Regards,

Neha

↧

MB1B stock mvt in Hu material

May 25, 2013, 3:41 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Could you please help me on this issue:

 

At our cutomer some users use tcode MB1B for stock transfer  mvt 322 instead of VLMOVE because of Hu material.

MB1B in case of Hu material causes some errors then ou customer asked me to add  a check with Error message in

tcode MB1B in order to block stock transfer with MB1B in case of Hu material.

 

Can i do that via customizing  ?  if not witch better exit or badi where the check must be done ?

Why standard doesn't check this case ?

 

Any input will be appreciated.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

 

Toubkal.

↧
↧

Consider GR movement type 103 for on-time delivery score

May 26, 2013, 3:53 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts

We have a two-step goods receipt process with movement types 103 followed by 105 in use. It may happen, that up to 10 days internal processing time is between the two steps. For the vendor evaluation we have to consider the first step with movement type 103 for the score calculation of sub-criteria "on-time delivery" - otherwise the scores are wrong. SAP standard is only considering movement types 101 or 105.

Do you have any idea how to respect movement type 103 instead of 105 for that?

 

Thanks a lot in advance.

 

BR

Peter

↧

Discount Amount with PO

May 26, 2013, 4:37 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am looking to Pull out some data like; All PO list with Created By and the Discount given amount.

 

Thanks in Adv.

↧

Cross-System Stock Transfers between two R/3 systems purchasing

May 20, 2013, 8:58 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts

                      we are implementing cross system STO  i.e PO created in receiving system and uncheck delivery created in suppling system.

i have read all notes related to this process and i am a bit confused.

 

how is the vendor assigned to the external plant? according to SAP

 

Ordering System (R/3)

 

Vendors and delivering plants that are in other R/3 systems are assigned in customizing for Enterprise Structure under Definition à Logistics General à Define, Copy, Delete, Check Plant à Define Plants for Cross-System Goods Flow. In addition, the logical system is
specified.

 

however this is no field for vendor only for plant and logical system and availibilty check.

 

 

With the normally STO you assign the plant to the vendor master, however if i do this i receive error that company code is not defined.

but without assigning the vendor none of the badi's are processed i.e unchecked delivery created in external plant system.

 

please help with my understanding

↧
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>