Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Stock Transfer - changing ship-to during delivery creation

October 31, 2014, 10:30 am
$
0
0

http://scn.sap.com/thread/1607115

I've followed the instructions in this thread for updating the TPAER table to allow a change in ship-to for my partner procedure related to NLCC delivery type:

SE16N displays as follows:

tpaer.jpg

Even after doing this, the standard config still shows that the ship-to is not changeable (like it's not reflecting this change)

Logistics Execution --> Shipping --> Basic Shipping Functions --> Partners --> Set up Partner Determination in Deliveries

TPAER2.jpg

I included both the config and the SE16N change in my transport, yet in my test system, I am still unable to update the ship-to during delivery creation (field is grayed out):

OBD.jpg

Any thoughts on why the SE16N change isn't being reflected in configuration -- and why it's not behaving like the prior thread suggests?

Regards,

Gina

↧
Search

A Material with Valuation Type but no Master Data

October 31, 2014, 7:33 am
$
0
0

Hello Gurus,

 

We have a strange situation here.

We don't maintain a split valuation however there was a material incorrectly created with a valuation category.

Obviously, this material didn't extended for the valuation type.

While the material master was in that state, there was a GR (for a production order) done strangely with valuation type '1'.

Now we want to reverse the GR but getting “Valuation record 'material #' 'plant' 01 does not exist” error.

BTW, this was done for a project stock.

Our ultimate goal is to remove the valuation category in the material master data but we can't unless we remove the stock first.

Is there a way we can accomplish our goal?

Your help would be appreciated.

 

Thank you,
Eddie

↧
↧

PO History Tab BzWE vs. DCGR and WE vs. GR

October 31, 2014, 8:59 am
$
0
0

I know that these descriptions exist on the T163C table, but the problem I'm having is I would like it to display with the GR instead of the WE, or the DCGR instead of the BzWE.  There is no settings for language that I have found so far that will do it.  Examples:

 

 

Capture P21.JPG

Capture 330.JPG

↧

VL06P creates extended LQUAY locks

November 2, 2014, 3:14 pm
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

I have unique situation at a client, First I would like to give a bacground of system configuration

 

we have sap delayed delivery update on. setting is set to "2" (delay update until all the TOs for delivery is confirmed) we have this setting to allow multiple users perfroming RF picking at same time without blocking eachother when they are picking for the same delivery. Bin blocking logic is set to "B" for maxmum sharing

 

Issue: We use VL06P to create TOs for delivery, our deliveries are decent size (3K to 4K lines), When we do that system create LQUAY locks in databse and does not release them until the TO creation process is over for the entire delivery. During this time the RF users can not get through their task and system keep shoing "processing" status on guns.

 

Is there anythingwe can do to prevent this. This causes downtime in warehouse and frustation while picking.

 

Thanks,

Kandarp

↧

Exception Message 20

October 30, 2014, 9:23 am
$
0
0

is there a transaction to display items with Exception Message 20 in one report?

↧
↧

New PO doc type creation/Screen layout def/Enjoy fields/material field/ impossible to take my new customizing into account

November 3, 2014, 9:16 am
$
0
0

Hello All,


I currently face an issue in MM with the enjoy fields of the Screen Layout at Document Level definition.

 

Please find below the issue description and the explanation of what I did :


Customizing :
> Creation of a new PO doc type : Materials Management/ Purchasing/ Purchase Order/Define Document Types
> Customizing on Enjoy fields for material in the screen layout : Materials Management/ Purchasing/ Purchase Order /Define Screen Layout at Document Level : ENJOY FIELDS


1/ My first customizing
1.1 Materials Management/ Purchasing/ Purchase Order/Define Document Types
I have created a new document type ZDIV and assigned to it the field selection key ZBS.
1.2 Materials Management/ Purchasing/ Purchase Order /Define Screen Layout at Document Level : ENJOY FIELDS
For the field selection ZBS (table T162) I have customized the enjoy fields this way for the material field (I wanted the material field to be mandatory in the new document ZDIV)

Field Label                    Reqd.entry        Opt. entry        Display
Material                               X

I released my OT and transport it to the qualification environment to test it


2/ Second customizing
After my first test in the qualification environment, I decided to replace the Reqd.entry  by the optional entry for the Material field in ENJOY FIELDS, and I have transported my new customizing in the qualification system. But despite of my new customizing, the "material status" remains the same in my new document type ZDIV, i.e. the material field remains mandatory in the purchase order ! (instead of optionnal)


Field Label                    Reqd.entry         Opt. entry          Display
Material                                                      X

 

I have missed something ?

Thank you very much for your help

Vincent

↧

Preq release strategy tab disappears

September 18, 2014, 8:53 am
$
0
0

We are having an issue where a few odd times, we will find that a Preq is missing its Release Strategy Tab. Here is an example, and my findings so far below the image.

 


PR10001163.png

 

Checking the Workflow, I see there was a workflow started, so I know the release strategy must have kicked in.

 

workflow.JPG

I see that the workflow went to error, with the error saying "No Authorization to Release"

WorkflowError.JPG

However I checked the user, and they do have the correct Release Level Role.

So I'm not sure where to check next?

↧

Lock the Materal Description Field (MAKT-MAKTX)

August 18, 2014, 11:51 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

I have to lock the MAKT-MAKTX field in MM02 in some cases.

Is there any User-Exit which can help me? Or any other ideas?

kind regards Patrick

↧
Search

Account Determination

November 3, 2014, 10:49 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I would like to understand how to meet the below client requirement,

 

The business requires the system to determine separate GL accounts for Price differneces in the below cases

 

1) In case of internal transactions (between company codes) and

2) External procurement (Third party purchases)

This scenario is for finished materials and different Purchase order types are used in these transactions.

 

Also note that these materials have the same valuation class

 

Kindly advice how this requirement can be addressed.

 

Regards

 

PJ

↧
↧

Intra and Inter Company STO with Customer Call Off Functionality

October 30, 2014, 3:54 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have a scenario to be mapped. Intra Company STO (Internal Plant to Plant within same legal entity) and Inter Company STO process (Shipping to Customer who belongs to Same Company but diff Legal Entity).

 

Here, in both the Cases, the Demand is received in the form of Customer Call-Offs (Schedule Lines). In Sales Scheduling Agreement, we can very well have this Customer Call-Offs updated as Forecast / JIT Schedule Lines. But I am not sure whether we can use similar Call-off functionality in Intra Company STO and Intercompany Process.

 

Pls provide your inputs. Thanks.

↧

SFG&FG initial stock uploading with value& with out costing

November 3, 2014, 9:44 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Please give me clarification on below points while uploading the initial stocks of SFG&FG's

 

1. Client have dead FG stocks and don't have a BOM,Routing for that materials and price indicator is "S", how to upload the stocks with value because here we are not running the costing.

 

2. When update the value from MR21, what is impact on FI ledger

 

please give me solution for above ASAP

↧

Partial Settlement Vendor Rebate

November 6, 2014, 8:00 am
$
0
0

Hi gurus,

 

I would like to create the following Vendor Rebate into the MEB1:

a) It is an annual rebate, therefore the validity period of rebate agreement is from 01.01.2014 to 31.12.2014

b) there are quarterly settlement: Q1 31.03.2014, Q2 30.06.2014, Q3 30.09.2014 e Q4 31.12.2014

c) Condition record for material XXX is 1%

 

In order to perform a partial settlement, the rebate agreement type has the funtion "Different val.period" checked in Control Data and the LT (Quarterly Settlement calendar defined) at Settlement tab.

 

My idea to recreate this cenarios is one annual agreement with 4 condition records. Each condition record has the validity period of the quarterly and therefore, we could perform the partial settlement in MEB4 lin each period.

 

My problem is when I creating the first condition record and insert the material and then execute period-execute conditions the valid from to of main condition, is blocked (I can´t overwrite to 01.01.2014 to 31.03.2014). How can configure this  functionality in order to be able to overwrite these fields? or how i can configure the factory calendar LT in order to bring automatically the correct period. Please, remind I need 4 Q and the datas are different.

 

Also, the SAP shows valid dates of period-spec condition by day, it means 365 more or less lines and when I try to check the BVC (MEU2) I can see the day by day. As the amount of condition is going to be the same during the entire quarterly. How can i configure the period to be only one line Valid from 01.01.2014 to 31.03.2014 or at least line by month and not by day.

 

Thanks in advance for your colaboration

 

Regards

↧

Change Material Origin at Purchase Order

November 6, 2014, 8:46 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have applied a support package that disabled this field at the Purchase Order.

 

The support from SAP informed us that it isnt possible to enable it by snote.

 

I would like to know if theres a way to enable it by customizing or even ABAP code.

 

Thanks!

Jeferson

↧
↧

Stock on any date by Vendor(not consignment)

November 6, 2014, 8:27 am
$
0
0

Hello IM/WM gurus,

I had raised this question earlier in the ABAP development section, but there was no response. Since this relates to the IM/WM area, I am hoping some of you functional experts can give me guidance.

What is the best way to get stock on any key date(current or in the past) by supplier for a material or materials. I am NOT talking about vendor consignment stock, just the regular stock in our warehouse. I tried to get all batches that were GR-ed in the past for that vendor and material and then used the SHKZG(debit/credit) indicator in MSEG to add/subtract respectively the quantities for each movements on or before the key date, against the batch. This came out with correct stock numbers in a lot of cases, but failed in others, Does anyone have a good way of coming up with the right numbers?

 

Would greatly appreciate any suggestion.

 

Thanks and regards,

Wayfarer

↧

Sequence screen in Material Managament

November 6, 2014, 11:37 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

Can anyone tell me what is sequence screen in material management and and why we need to customizing it ? (with real time senerio)

↧
Search

MR8M short dump GETWA_NOT_ASSIGNED

November 6, 2014, 12:29 pm
$
0
0

Hi!

 

I don´t know if this is the place to post this question.

We are trying to cancel an invoice that refers to a purchase order with multiple account assignment but we have a dump in include LMRMKF03 (line 263 of METHOD multiaccountassignment) program SAPLMRMK.

Did anyone have the same problem?

 

Thanks!

Cristian

↧

Purchase requisition release strategy budget holder creation

November 6, 2014, 9:40 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

 

I am sap mm consultant, got an issue pertaining to release strategy of purchase requisition, system is not allowing budget holder to approve purchase requisition.

where can we check the settings and who is responsible to create budget holder in release strategy what is the transaction code and path to create BH.

please help me.

 

Thanks,

 

AMD

↧
↧

MM impact of comany codes Merger

November 6, 2014, 3:01 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I have the following scenario: in one client we have two company codes and these must be merged. One of them will continue working and new plants must be created and assigned to it in order to replace the old plants of the company code that will be "deactivated".

 

In this system we just have FI/CO, PS, MM and SD. No WM, PM, PP or FM. I have seen the blogs http://scn.sap.com/thread/3544283 but i have some additional questions.

 

In MM we have simple procurment and inventory processes with split valuation on the stock items. I would like to know which areas to take care of. I am thinking the following:

 

1. Customization of new plant

 

2. Changes in Roles, User exits, Print out forms etc

 

3. Migrate materials in new plant (with ALE & IDoc thanx to Jurgen LSMW migration with IDOC method  and using IDOC as source  Part1: Extract by ALE)

 

4. Migrate Info records (with ALE & IDoc thanx to Jurgen LSMW migration with IDOC method  and using IDOC as source  Part1: Extract by ALE)

 

5. Migrate open PR's, PO's, conrtracts and scheduling agreements

 

6. Migrate Stock

 

Is there something that i am missing?

 

On the above issues, for the PO's migration i was thinking of changing the plant with MEMASSPO. Is this correct? What is the impact on the partially delivered or invoiced PO's? How to handle contracts and schedule agreements?

 

About P. Organization i was thinking to un-assing it from the old company code and assign in to the comapny code that will remain. Does this have any impact?


Moreover, What about stock. Cause i have 23000 materials to perform 562 and a new 562. Based on the restriction of 333 per document it is quite tricky to perform it. Is there any suggestion on this?

 

Finally, i have seen this notes:

 

605598  - SLO service: Merging company codes (package 20200

 

1589619  - SAP LT V2: 'Company Code Merge' transformation solution

 

Do you have any idea what is this SAP Landscape Transformation?

 

Thank you all.

 

BR

↧

Subcontracting with SC Vendor

November 5, 2014, 11:37 am
$
0
0

We are running a subcontracting scenario where one of the raw materials is provided by an external supplier instead of shipping from own warehouse.

 

So PO for subcontractor

     Material FG : 10 EA

     RM A          : 5 EA

     RM B          : 5 EA

PO for external supplier to be shipped to subcontractor directly.

     RM A          : 5 EA

 

If we look at ME2ON for assembly 10 it shows correctly as

Raw Material A

     Total SC stock      :  0 EA

     Req via SC order   :  5 EA -

     External deliveries  :  5 EA +

Raw Material B

     Total SC stock      :  0 EA

     Req via SC order   :  5 EA -

 

 

The problem lies in the fact that for ME2ON for raw material A there is nothing to indicate to a user that they SHOULD NOT ship out the material from warehouse inventory.

 

Does SAP offer a way to block these deliveries or run an availability check to create deliveries with 0 stock?

Without it there is no system control to create additional deliveries for Raw Materials resulting in over shipment to subcontractor.

↧

2 issues with change indicator for pO

November 6, 2014, 2:18 pm
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have 2 questions on changed PO's.

 

1.  What triggers the change box being checked in 'messages'?  For example, we have an original PO with 20 line items and output is generated.  Later, we change a quantity on line item 2.  Then when we click on messages, it correctly generates a new output, however the change indicator is not flagged.  If I delete this new output and click on 'change PO', then it will generate a new output with the change box flagged. Is this standard behavior? Do we need to delete the output generated from the change, and then flag the original output as 'change PO'?

 

2.  Should we only see the changed line item on the 'changed PO'? It is showing all items regardless if they are changed or not.

 

It says 'Changed PO" at the top, but why are all line items printing? Shouldn't only the changed item print?  Please advise.  If this is a configuration issue, please indicate where this is maintained.  I have compared configuration with our old system and it is identical. Could this be standard behavior in V.6.0?

 

Thank you.

↧
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>