Hi Experts:
We are trying to posting the inventory Difference ( Tx. MI07) reducing inventory (movement 702) using serial numbers with valuation type ( NEW ) appears the next messages:
".Stock data of serial number 7000008025 not suitable for movement (Message no. IO231)".
"Serial number 7000008025 cannot be used here (IO201)"
I checked the data on tx. IQ09 and the combination material-serial number exists.
The system status from the serial number is ESTO
We're in SAP ECC 6.00
Any ideas???
Hello Guys:
We came with an issue in UAT with client. I will explain my problem as under
Principal Vendor A...Goods Costs =1000 USD ..Transport cost chargeable to Vendor A=100
Insurance Cost=100 Chargeable to Vendor B
For above we created a PO, did GRN and when going to invoice verification in MIRO , user is selecting option 3 in Miro which is Goods/Services+Planned Del Costs for posting main vendor invoice for Goods cost 1000 and Transport cost 100 making total value of invoice 1100, however when i see in items section of MIRO i see that system is also picking the line items of Insurance cost which were to be charged to Vendor B and upon simulation system is posting the whole amount of 1200 USD to Vendor A which is wrong. Though we have an option of selecting Planned delivery cost but what if user gets one invoice for 1100 from Vendor A for Goods and planned del costs, system should not behave like. this. Is there any way to avoid this from happening ?
Thanks
Dear All ,
in our process flow G/L field status cost center is going to be mandatory and so in each transaction like PR/ PO creation user has to enter the cost center. Now if the material is getting 411 Q movement type system is giving error as Message no. F5808
DIAGNOSIS "The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account in company code linked to the field selection for posting key "86".
FICO don't want the cost center mandatory posting key 86 because its impacting in FICO area and on the other hand for movement type 411 Q cost center is already mandatory
so suggest work around so that this error can be resolved
i have search in the forum but none is inline with the way we want it ( because changing the field selection area in std configuration is not the solution in our case
Thanks
Dear all,
I recently settle consignment using MRKO. The accounting posting is like:
Dr. 40 Consignment Clearing 9
Dr. 40 Input Tax; 2
Cr. 50 Vendor(1040) 3
Cr. 50 Vendor(1040) 4
Cr. 50 Vendor(1040) 4
Vendor lines get separated for unknown reason. I must have missed something in the system because I have seen other normal consignment document which has only one vendor lines.
Could anyone give me a hand and I will appreciate a lot.
Dear Experts ,
We are started procuring Material code which is common for inventory stock and project stock as well ( spl stock Q ) and for the same material batch is activated .User don't want batches for normal inventory GRN but only for project based GRN for the material.
To achieve this following measure has been tried .
# Created z movement for GRN for project stock procurement and made it as ( "No creation"- in Batch classification in goods movement in IM )
# Then while doing GRN with z movement system giving error as "Enter batch" for message M7018 but couldn't find it in OMCQ to change in warning
Appreciate your inputs how to configure same material batch for project GRN not for stock inventory GRN .
Thanks .
hi Gurus,
I wanted to know the following.
What is the difference between Blanket Purchase Order and the Framework Order.
Thanks.
Hi,
I created an INTER company STO and when I see the delivery schedule tab, I see a committed date but not a committed qty. Why is that happening ?
Also when I see the CO09 screen after calling it from the STO, I don't see anything confirmed for this STO. The check without RLT is NOT selected in the scope of check. 
Can someone tell me why I don't see a confirmed qty of 0 on 12/19 which is the end of the RLT ? Also what is the simulated requirements line I see on the CO09 screen ?
The rule for adoption of the ATP results in purchasing is blank and accumulation settings for 02 checking grp is 3.
So I'm trying to build a query report to find blocked invoices that lists the invoice totals and have a question about if there is a better way to get this data.
So the RBKP table is the header record, but the payment blocked field ZLSPR is only filled in if the block is manually selected.
The RSEG invoice detail table has individual fields for each type of payment block.
SPGRP
SPGRM
SPGRT
SPGRG
SPGRV
SPGRQ
SPGRS
SPGRC
SPGREXT
This could have several lines per invoice record with a mix of lines that have blocked statuses and ones that don't.
So it seems to me that I have to do a sub-query to pull these together, (Forgive me, I'm new to SAP), In SQL I'd do this like
"SELECT * FROM RBKP where BELNR in (select BELNR from RSEG where SPGRP is not null or SPGRM is not null or ...(etc))"
Are there any other tables/structures etc to use to pull this together easier? I need to build a query report that shows blocked invoices with their total invoice values listed.
I have a user who is getting a long delay when starting ME51N. A trace shows that the EBAN table is being accessed and taking a huge amount of time. Does anyone know why that table might be accessed when starting this transaction, and how to stop it? I've attached a bit of a trace that shows the problem.
Thanks,
Jim
Hi,
we have an issue in allocating inventory to Stock transport orders.
We are trying to manually allocate a specific amount of inventory to each of 4 STO’s. The problem is that we did the manual allocate and committed 20 case to each of the STO’s, but when we created the deliveries they created 20 on the 1st STO, 22.13 on 2nd and 3rd STOs. 2nd and 3rd STOs have the quantity of 30 and 23. Shouldn’t we be able to allocate what we want for a STO?
Please help.
Thanks in Advance.
Hello experts,
I tried to search some documents/link which can give enough information on my query but unfortunately did not find that's why I am posting my issue here.
My query is related to STO configuration I am bit confuse on some fields functionality.
MM >> Purchasing >> Purchase Order >> St up Stock transport order >> Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule.
Actually I want to know the functionality of highlighted fields. We are also working Inter .Intra company STO but these highlighted field are not in used I what to know the is the exact functionality of these fields.
1. Perform Shipment Scheduling >> If we activate this check box then would we able to do shipment for relevant deliveries ??
2. Use Route Schedule for Shipment Scheduling ??
3. Delivery Type for Stock Transfers Within a Company Code >> we have already assign Delivery type then why this field ask to assign delivery again ?? or this option gives us the another option of delivery type ... If I assign another delivery type ..then I would have 2 options of delivery type ??
4. Delivery Type for Stock Transfers Between Two Company Codes ?? same as above ??
5. Delivery Type for Transfers to Consignment Stock >> any scenario where we use inter company with consignment process??
6. ATP: Profile at Requirements Level for APO ??
I don't want copy past from performance assistance/F1/sap help ...I expect some real time or valuable answers from your sides.
Awaiting your precious reply.
Thanks
Dear Experts,
Here is the scenario,
We purchased common part A from vendor X by schedule agreement, and delivery material A to venodr Y and vendor Z for subcontracting.
Vendor Y, semifinish good B:A, BOM: 1:1;
Vendor Z, another semifinish good C:A, BOM: 1:2
Let's make an example for my requirement,
requirement for semi B, 1 PC while 2 PC for semi C,
The total requirement for A should be 5 PC, the material A is packed as 3 PC per box from vendor X, and in our plant we will not do any unpacking for this material, we directly ship it to subcontractor.
Here is the question, according to the MRP result, we will get 6PC(2 Box) once we setup min lot size 3PC; but it will be a problem, since the requirement for vendor Y is 1 pc, 1 box needed, vendor Z, 4PC, 2 box is needed.
Any solution for this?
Thanks in advance.
Hi all,
I have made a Asset PO with WBS element with multiple account Assignment, but while doing GR and MB51 these two line items displaying as '*'.
I want this to display Asset and WBS element in MB51.
Please Guide me
1. PO
2. MIGO
3. MB51
Hi,
while creating reservation(MB21) I want to throw error message if material has MRP type as "ND"(No planning in the MRP view1 of material master).
The error message should be " material XXXXXXX has ND as MRP Type,please contact warehouse key user".Can I achieve this thru configuration?
Or I have to go for some enhancement? Can you please give some tips for this?
With Regards,
Jaheer.
Dear，
i have a qustion about consignment, now i have two warehouse no. A01 A02 in EWM.
and the storage location is A01 = 0001 , A02 = 0002 。
now i want to move master from 0001 to 0002,but beacuse there are two warehouse no.,so i can not use 311k.
SO,I want to use transfer order 351 K, but sap standard is not include specil K,how to addition it for 351.?
Hi Everyone,
While creating PO GR i want to create STO GR in sameMIGO transaction. when i am trying with badi i am not able to create it beacase same function module is gettig called for creation of GR and if i am trying before PO GR creation STO GR is getting created but PO is not getting created and getting an error message .if i want to due it in backgound kindly help me how to create the STO GR in background. If PO GRis successfully created then only my STO GR need to be created
Thanks in advance
Sravani
Hello People,
I need your help with this scenario:
a) I have a service PR created with ref to a contract.
b) I am not sure exactly which contract service line item which were referred by the PR
c) When I double click the contract within the PR it only shows the item overview #10 not the service item number
What is the easiest way to find this out. Please advise.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Suthagar
hello ,
experts,
this scenario belongs to Subcontracting, user has done the GI for 4 components,now system is not allowing him
4 sub components against a vendor, component 1 is having less stock, and the component 4 have some what more stock, 1 and 4 materials are almost same in specification , only material number change
now user wants to move some amount of stock of component 4 to 1, is it Possible in ME2o,
or what kind of Process we need to fallow, or regular transfer posting,
screen shot attached for your reference,
Hello Experts,
we have inter/intra company stock transfer scenario without SD/billing.
we have 3 wholesale plants and some retail plants...our wholesale materials has MAP greated than retail materials (little wiered though)
we have transfer scenario from wholesale to retail....per standard SAP...transfer will happen with wholesale MAP but our requirement is that transfer from wholesale to retail should not impact MAP on retial side i.e. retail should receive stock with retail MAP not the wholesale MAP and difference should go to some account.
has anybody came across such a scenario and is this doable with some Z movement type config ?
earliest help is appreciated
Thanks
Dharmesh
Hello,
I got a requirement to change one of the existing material type to non-valuated in plant-A and told to settle the cost on G/L account 510XXX (OBYC - GBB/VBR) instead of inventory account. So I removed all the stock from plant-A and changed the config in OMS2 with Qty update="Checked" & Value update="Unchecked".
After this change in Sandbox, I created a PO with account assignment category "L" and the G/L 510XXX. The GR is done successfully against the new G/L. The problem is when i reverse the GR in movement 102 (or) 122. I got the error "Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 102 _ X _ B) - Message no. M7226". Could you please provide your recommendation to fix the issue.
Best Regards,
Baskar