Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live

Material master creation to activate mail message

$
0
0

Hi

 

We need to implement an alert that will notify certain individuals when a new material master is created.

I thought of using workflow, but not everyone on the alert list will have SAP user ID. Only other solution that I can think of, is using custom development via a z table containing email addresses including trigger (for example Material type, Plant etc).

 

Can someone please point me towards existing user exits, BADI, etc.?

Would appreciate any ideas/experience/knowledge that someone might have on this subject.

We are running basic SAP (ECC6 EHP6) and not using MDM.

 

Regards


Service PO quantity should not exceed service PR quantity

$
0
0

Dear Sapians,

 

 

I really need your help with this issue , we have a service PR which was generated from PS and now we are converting it to a PO . the problem is the system is allowing me to exceed the quantity approved in the PR and this means no control , we can put any quantity without limits in the PO service tab .

 

After investigation and search , I found out that there is an Error that can be activated SE438 " Quantity & exceeds target quantity & for the purchase req. by &" but it is not working . is there any badi or user exist to activate it.

 

 

This is regarding services , for materials it is covered using Error 06 076 "Materials of requisition & item & alr. ordered in full "and system  handles it perfectly , the point is it is affecting the services Purchasing as it is checking between EKPO and EBAN .

 

 

Consider the case , you create a po for services , the quantity in the main item is always 1 (EKPO quantity) , at the service tab you enter the actual quantities (ESSR quantity).

 

if you created two service POs for the same PR , system will prompt "Materials of requisition & item & alr. ordered in full " regardless the quantities in the service tabs , because it only considers the quantity in the main item (EKPO) which is 1 , the first PO used the quantity 1 in the PR , so any newly created po will exceed the limit as it checks between EKPO and EBAN , it should check quantities on ESSR Level.

 

 

waiting for your answers and thanks in advance.

 

Message was edited by: Jürgen L Refrain from using URGENT in your post, everybodies discussion is equally important, and you can't urge volunteers.Next time the discussion will be rejected

LIFO not to consider materials in a certain storage location

$
0
0

Hello Experts in MM,

I'm an FI consultant and don't know wheter there's the possibility to exclude a specific storage location from LIFO calculation.

I cannot find in the system how to do that, but I've the situation where materials enter in this storage location to exclude from LIFO and then move to other storage locations which I've to consider for LIFO. So in this case it's Storage location (and not material code or movement type) my element to consider or not.

 

Thanks a lot for your help in advance!!

 

Kind Regards,

 

Chiara

Stock in Transit in MD48

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

We have copied the Transaction MD48 to a customized T.code to consider for a specific plant and storage location.

 

1. We are creating the STO

2. Create the delivery and post the goods issue ,here when we check the Z T.code(Copy of MD48) The field warehouse stock is getting updated As soon as we post the goods issue.

 

The actual requirement is The stock needs to be updated in the Warehouse stock field once we post the GR.

 

Please let me know if any configuration changes are missing or is it a standard behaviour..?

 

 

 

Regards,
Gopinath

Supplier Ship Date for a PO Line

$
0
0

We have built custom logic in SAP ECC that allows us to notify our suppliers of the exact date that they need to ship product in order to fulfill our requested delivery date on a PO line.  We store our calculated ship date in a custom field on table EKET (Scheduling Agreement Schedule Lines) which is where the standard field (EINDT) for the PO line delivery date is located.

 

The first step of our calculation uses the PO line delivery date.  We subtract the transportation time that is maintained on the PIR or maintained in a custom table by supplier/purchasing organization (optional)/plant (optional) from the PO line delivery date. 

 

The second step in our calculation incorporates a shipment indicator (custom field maintained by supplier/purchasing organization) which allows us to determine if it’s a domestic or international shipment where the transportation will occur over the weekend.

 

In the third and final step of our calculation, we adjust the calculated ship date based on a custom shipment calendar that is assigned to the supplier/purchasing organization that allows us to know what days of the week the supplier ships and incorporates non-working holidays as well.

 

If the PO line is modified and the delivery date is changed by the PO owner, we adjust the calculated ship date accordingly using PO workflow.

 

Does anyone know if we can achieve the same result by using standard SAP functionality in SAP ECC?  Does SAP provide the ability to calculate a supplier ship date for a PO line based on the requested delivery date?

 

Best Regards,

W. Scott Klingensmith

SAP ME38 screen - Maintain scheduling agreement schedule

$
0
0

Hi

 

In Me38, the user needs additional fields on the delivery schedule screen:

 

CURRENT SCREEN

As Is.png

 

REQUIRED SCREEN

To Be.png

 

I doubt, if there is some authorization object linked to additional fields being displayed

Also, I read the scn posts, there are lots of user exits & BADI suggested

 

But, I want to be sure that, if I need to add fields via an user exit / BadI

OR

Am I just not aware of catering to the same by changing in layout, somewhere in ME38?

 

 

Best Regards

Yogesh Agarwal.

BAPI for Purchase Info Record Conditions.

$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

I am trying to pass the value through this BAPI (ME_PRICING_INFORECORD, ME_UPDATE_INFORECORD_COND) it is updating only the net price not the condition record. Please suggest me a bapi to update the condition record.

 

 

 

Regards

Suresh.M

Vendor Master Contact person

$
0
0

Gurus,

 

Per our client requirement, we have activated the contact person option in OMSX and then maintained the name and e-mail ID for the function in QA.

 

Now we need to send an e-mail to contact person e-mail ID based on the activity instead of VM general address because of the below reason.

 

The supplier’s Quality department is not receiving notification of sample receipts or dispositions (approved/ rejected).  This is causing significant delays in delivering either revised samples or approved material.  This can result in deficiencies in inventory and the vendor getting a negative score for late shipments and/or late samples – among other issues..  Now we need to modifying the programs that route documents to the appropriate VM contact person e-mail based on function .

 

Could you please suggest us how to achieve this.

 

Regards,

Sada


MM02 changes not captured in Change Documents

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I am making a few changes to the text for a material via MM02:

In transaction MM02- Basic Data 1->Additional Data->Internal Comment(the text present here is being changed)

 

Now the changes that I have done in the above path also gets reflected in the Sales Text tab of the MM02 transaction automatically.

 

Issue: The changes that I have done manually gets reflected in the Change Documents(MM02->Environment->Display Changes) but the changes that are done automatically via the system in the Sales Text tab of MM02 are not appearing the the Change Documents

 

Basic Data 1.PNG  Change Document.PNG

MRKO settlement

$
0
0

I am trying to do a settlement thru MRKO, i am getting an error

 

Taxes by item is activated,consequently transfer by item is mandatory.

printing in MB90 - details

$
0
0

Hi colleagues,

 

I read about printing in MB90 in threads like:

Output type configuration for GR : MB90

Assign user's default printer to transaction MB90

 

However in our system none of this settings is done, and printing is working fine.

The problem is - every document created is an entry in table NAST.

There is a field LDEST which shows on which printer shall it be printed. Every time it is

the same printer.

 

I also checked initial value of NAST-LDEST for purchase order

but I think it is relevant for R3 systems (I cannot find "menu options Purchasing document> -> Messages -> Print/transmit")

 

How can I understand where the system choses the printer?

I checked

OMJ3 - some irrelevent printer set, no effect of changing

NACE - nothing there,

OMBR - some irrelevent printer set, no effect of changing

 

Somehow the system knows the printer even while creating the document and put it in NAST table. I cannot find any information HOW!?

 

best regards

Ilian

Report for searching duplicate purchase orders/purchase requisitions

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Due to a very short planning horizon maintained in our system we have ended up in a situation where the MRP, at different dates, triggered duplicate purchase requisitions for the demand coming in from the same sales order line item. Those purchase requisitions have also been converted to purchase orders, so now we have duplicate purchase orders for the same sales orders as well. We have fixed the planning horizon now, but are unable to search all the duplicate purchase orders already created in the system.

 

Does anyone know of a report/transaction which can help us here (even a transaction to find duplicate purchase requisitions would be helpful)

 

Please note that all these POs are sales order assigned (account assignment category = E).

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

 

Best Regards,

V S

Display output of ME49 in ALV GRID instead in Excel

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Currrently ME49 is displaying output in List format. To display it in ALV grid, I maintain user parameter value  ME_USE_GRID = 'X'. After maintaining this parameter it should display output in ALV GRID. But to my surprise it is now displaying output in EXCEL format. How do I display it in ALV GRID format ?

 

Thanks

Viraj

Reverse Subcontracting-Valuation

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have a following requirement which is a sort of reverse subcontracting. Have viewed few threads on reverse subcontracting and able to get the desired output from inventory management point of view. However from the valuation perspective, the process is not accepted. Request your suggestions on this pls.

 

Regular BOM structure is

 

  1. Header 1 (F&30)         -  $1000
    1. Item 1(F)             - $400
    2. Item 2(F)             - $200
    3. Item 3(F)             - $200

 

Conversion cost of Header 1 is $200 and for some reasons we want the header to be dismantled and brought back to plant as item level stock.

 

Since we don't want to alter the regular BOM structure, created a subcontracting order, and in the components section, given the items in following structure and the conversion cost is $200.

 

  1. Item 1 (F)                    -              $400 (to be received via 101)
    1. Header 1(F&30)   -             $1000 (to be consumed as 543 (O) )
    2. Item 2(F)             -              $200  (to be received via 545 SC BP)
    3. Item 3(F)             -              $200 (to be received via 545 SC BP)


We are able to post the inventory transactions in the above structure, but the value of Item 1 got posted wrongly. Following are the accounting entries.


 

RM - Stock A/C800.00Item 1
GR/IR 200-Item1
COGM from SC800-Item1
Conv Charges200.00Item1
RM - Stock A/C1000-Header 1
COGM trd to SC1,000.00Header 1
RM - Stock A/C200Item 2
COGM trd to SC200-Item 2
RM - Stock A/C200Item 3
COGM trd to MOS w/o200-Item 3


We have expected the value of Item 1 to remain as 400 and request your views on possibilities for achieving this.


Thanks

Balaji

Update EHP4 to EHP6 - MM Impacts

$
0
0

Hello Everybody,

 

 

I would like to know if someone could help me about EHP6 update at SAP. Actually, we are in EHP4 version and in a project to update our version to EHP6, however, we need to search for impacts or risks for some of modules in it.In my situation, we are looking for MM module impacts.

 

 

Could someone help me to find something that are specifically details of all kinds of update this module will have? Or someone who had cross this situation to talk about what we need to worry about? Unfortunately we have a lot of customizations, and we are worry about it.

 

 

We search for some of SAP documents, but we didn't find anything that show us detail each impacts that transactions on the material management process will be affect.

 

 

 

Thanks for all the help!!

 

 

 

 

Best Regards,

 

 

Raphael Palmieri

MM Consultant Jr.


How to Identify ADOPT Command in ME21N

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am trying to implement a custom change in ME21N after user clicked ADOPT to a Purchase Order

I don't mind doing it in a BADI or User Exit or enchancment spot.

 

When in the BADI and etc'

I cannot identify that the user clicked ADOPT

 

Help please.

 

 

BR,

Or.

PR(service, material) price change issue in PS

$
0
0

Dear Expert,

 

 

 

I have following senarion in PS during PR price change. I want to change the PR (Service) value in activity of PS.

 

pr1.png

1. when I was trying to change the PR value in PS in particular activity then the following information message was prompt and the price field was grey, and I am not able to change the PR value.

 

2. i did customisation in SPRO-Material Management -> Purchasing -> Environmental Data -> Define Attribute of system data-> system mesage, and change there system mesage as bellow

PR2.png.

3.Now i am able to change the price of PR, but I dont want to change the PR( Service or Material both) Value less than PO.

 

4. Also release strategy  should not be impacted while decreasing the value.

 

My concern is that I want to change the PR value for both Service or Material type, but system should not allow less price than PO value. In the current senario PR value can be modify less tha PO value whic is wrong.

 

Please advice any suggestion.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

M S Ansari

Relationship between Output Type and Movement Type

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I get quite confuse on the difference between WA01, 02 and 03.

 

Is there any table, configuration, or T-Code which I can view the relationship between the output type and the movement type?

 

Thanks,

Steven

Bi weekly planning and creation of Purchase requisitions

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have a requirement where a material needs to be planned on Bi weekly Friday so that we could create a requisition having delivery date on its subsequent Monday . Can you let me know how we could approach the solution

 

Regards

 

Nevin

MC.1-Valuation class is not coming into XXL

$
0
0

H Experts,

 

In MC.1,there is a valuation class  but when I am trying to extract the report valuation class wise it is not coming a option in XXL SAP screen.FYI,pls see the below snap shot.

1.jpg

 

2.JPG

 

Kindly let me know how to get the valuation class on above screen.

 

Best regards,

Narendra Konnipati

Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>