Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

MIR7/MIRO

February 19, 2015, 1:11 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

Normally, when we post MIR7, system checks material stock for FI Posting.

If Material stock available while Posting , it will post to stock g/l

If Material stock not available then system will  post to price difference g/l.

 

Now my requirement is ,

 

Is it possible to check Material stock of particular vendor while MIR7 Posting.

 

i.e if i am posting MIR7 for Vendor ID : V1, for material ID :  M1

Here system should check stock of Vendor V1 for material M1 only and post FI entry accordingly.

 

If it is possible then pl guide me how to do it.

 

 

Thanks & Regards

Swati Shah

↧
Search

Higher-Level Item in Purchasing Documents

February 20, 2015, 6:23 am
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

I would like to use the functionnality Higher-Level Item in ME22N. But I cannot use it.

I got the error message : "Sub-items of this category cannot be created manually"

 

I made a search on forum but I cannot find solutions

 

Could you kindly help me ?

 

In advance, many thanks for your reply.

 

Best Regards,

Virginie Frigo

↧
↧

due date in purchase order

May 25, 2013, 11:27 am
$
0
0

In purchase order I cannot see the due date... I can' find the payment processing tab.

1) HOw can I activate it?

2) Is the due date in the payment processing the due date of the vendor invoice?

Thanks a lot....

↧

SAP MM - Price update

February 21, 2015, 8:49 am
$
0
0

Hi there,

 

We have a scenario whereby the client creates Purchase Orders for materials whose prices change mid-way after some of the orders have been partially invoiced. For instance, at the time of creating the Purchase Order, the price of the material was at US$10 and the quantity of the material is 5 meaning the total Purchase Order value should be US$50 (Material Price US$10 x Quantity 5). This scenario depicts a partial goods issue/invoicing.

 

Now, if 2 items are invoiced, at US$20 (Material Unit price x quantity 2) the Purchase Order remaining 3 quantities. On the Purchase Order the remaining Purchase Order will have 3 quantities and the price as US$30.

 

Now the client prices keep changing and would like the new prices to reflect on the already created Purchase Orders. For instance if the price changed from US$10 per that specified material to US$12, the client wants that price to be updated on the already created PO for the unprocessed items. It is desired that the remaining PO should be able to update from US$30 (material price US$10 x Quantity 3) to US$36 (material price US$12 x Quantity 3).

 

Is this possible in SAP MM?

 

If possible, how can this be achieved? Any other way of accomplishing this?

 

We are dealing with moving prices and markets that are unpredictable.

 

Please advise.

 

  Thanks.


Kind regards,

Dave

↧

Valuation type intercompany stock transfer

February 20, 2015, 9:07 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have configured intercompany stock transfer process. I created po for intercompany & put valuation type " manufacturer" in po line item. I have done delivery & PGI with same valuation type .But now at the time of GRN with respect to outbound delivery I want to change valuation type from "manufacturer to trading "but field is non editable & default it is taking as "manufacturer" . SO please suggest..I already serach on scn but not found perfect solution .

 

Thanks & Regards,

↧
↧

Problem during quota arrangement

February 21, 2015, 5:28 am
$
0
0

Hi experts ,

 

actually I've faced a problem while doing quota arrangement . I've properly maintained data in MEQ1 with respective maximum quantity but during the creation of PR , when I, yet to press " assign to source of supply button " - all three vendors got selected instead of specific one vendor.

 

why it behaves so ? n how could I solve it ?

 

qtm.jpg

 

qtm1.jpg

regards

patel

↧

Export TEXTS from PO to control supplier performance

February 20, 2015, 4:19 pm
$
0
0

Hi all:

 

Here again with another question from my team :-)

 

These days we are having some brainstorming sessions to re-think our own supplier evaulation process. We are using the tools SAP provides, and we are happy with the results and the procedure to follow.

 

As you well know, we can measure how reliable the supplier is confirming, shipping and delivering, also having the chance to measure quality performance and price evolution.

 

With all these tools, we have a good position and an objective way to measure performances. The point is we cannot or we don't know how measure the impact of possibles soon or late delivery in production scheduling. In theory, if planning dept did their job well, scheduling the customer order and production according to component availability no problem should arise, and a delay in supplier would mean an un-score because they are affecting the planned schedule.... but what about if Planning dept didn't??

 

On top of it, sometimes we have some suppliers who delivers thousands of lines, and they do well, delivering 95% or more on time, but what about those 5% are late?, what about if those 5% represents a big amount of units forcing to re-schedule thousands of orders, we are saying that supplier is performing well, but the truth is the supplier isn't.

 

Maybe your answer is to reduce the MOQ, but just think for a second a supplier who delivers 1000 lines, 5% means, 50 lines, let's say 12 units per line (12 units per box is the minium acceptable) as minimum 600 units. In our production pull system, we have customer orders for 2-5 units most times, so that means we need to reschedule between 120 and 300 customer orders, just considering one single supplier.

 

My point is, how could include a text message, easy-exportable or easy visible releasing a ME2L or any other transaction, having a list of PO with a text informing (this text would be included by procurement team) you that PO caused a re-scheduling???, putting together supplier evaulation tools you could mix up, obtainning a list of PO delayed and/or affecting production.

 

I hope you understand my point, and I hope you can provide your ideas, feedback or solution.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Raul

↧

Update Prices and PO's

February 17, 2015, 11:53 am
$
0
0

Hi Sap Gurus:

 

I'm creating this thread to solve a question I have from long ago.

 

Problem definition: Every month components that contain, are made off or even are transformed from material whose price follows market trends, like Aluminium, Copper between others, need to be updated.

 

Scope: Inforecords, open PO's and new PO's.

 

Workload: The magnitude depends on each organization, but in our case we are talking about 1000 codes from mainly 8 different vendors every month.

 

Current way of acting: First, retrieve all new prices from all suppliers, it could be done in the four first days of the month. Once it is received, we gather by using ZSE16D and EINA, EINE tables all the inforecords for these vendors.

Once info obtained is updated with the new values, a ticked is opened, creating a SM7 request which uses Winshuttle program to update the data.

For the PO's opened in the timeframe, we use YAOPENPO, we filter by dates in Excel and update manually.

 

Problems detected: Because of the time needed to retrieve all the information (around 4 days), prepare the docs, and raise the ticket we are updating the information on 6th or even 8th, that means all PO's generated in that time are done with old prices, creating mismatchs in MIRO sometimes. We are now pushing to get the information earlier but the problem is still there.

The second problem is, of course, time consuming.

 

Solutions in mind:

 

I hope you can clarify me these concepts

 

Thanks in advance :-)

↧
Search

Modify message type in MIGO (only for one of our plants)

February 21, 2015, 10:49 pm
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

We have a requirement, whereby we are consuming a pipeline material, but need to avoid getting its valuation effect (of consumption) on our material produced (using 261P). In normal scenario one would use a non-valuated material in such cases, but in this scenario, I have to use a pipeline material type & need to block its valuation effect while consumption.

I have maintained the info records in such a way, that the price of this material comes out to be 0.01 USD / 10000 TO (which works out to be zero due to rounding while consumption is posted), due to which SAP throws a standard error message M7 - 234 (Pipeline/consignment movement posted without value).

I can make this message as warning through configuration (OMCQ), but that will be applicable to all my plants / companies.

We need to control this only for a specific plant.

My question is can I control the message category through some exit / BADI / enhancement for MIGO ?

Your help would be appreciated.

 

Best regards,

Zafar 

↧
↧

pricing condition to adjust commission while invoice parking (for inter company stock transfer)

February 22, 2015, 2:26 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts

 

I am facing a problem related to purchasing condition. I am trying to deduct commission amount from vendor account while invoice parking (mir7) but the commission amount shows as debit entry. As per my client requirement - i have to automatically deduct the commission amount from vendor account while invoice parking through MIR7 (for inter company stock transfer) as credit entry. please find below the full scenario.

 

Current customization for condition type "Commission"

  • Condition class = B Prices
  • Calculation Type = A Percentage
  • Condition category = B Delivery costs

 

PO:

PB00 Gross Price - 600 BDT

ZVC3 Commission - 15% which is 90 BDT

Total Amount - 510 BDT

 

Current Invoice Parking:

GR/IR A/C Dr. 100

Vendor A/C Cr. -120

Commission A/C Dr. 20

 

Expecting Invoice Parking:

GR/IR A/C Dr. 100

Vendor A/C Cr. -80

Commission A/C Cr. -20

 

So, what will be the customization for condition type "Commission"?

  • Condition class = ?
  • Calculation Type = (will be percentage in our case)
  • Condition category = ?
  • Control data 2 = ?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards,

 

Md. Saidur Rahman

↧

Remote Site Receiving

February 20, 2015, 4:43 pm
$
0
0

Hello SCN Experts,

 

I have scenario where company is having remote sites/location (could be in hundreds/thousands), for which plant creation is not feasible process. How do we deal with material receiving directly to remote site ? Do we follow cost center approach with account assignment as such material delivered by vendor will be for consumption purpose. Also how do we deal with order creation directly shipped to remote location sites ? material has to be delivered directly by vendor to remote locations.

 

would love to hear from experts.


- 

↧

Regarding Form JJ in VAT

February 28, 2009, 5:17 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I would like to know about form JJ realted VAT, purpose, applicability.

Please inform briefly about form JJ.

 

Thanks

maniyanks

↧

Pr. Date Cat in ME22 cannot chang

February 22, 2015, 10:53 pm
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

Im trying to change the Pr. Date Cat 4 to 5, but system gives me an error message "Pricing at time of goods receipt not possible for this item

Message no. 06634". I have checked this issue has come with other people but no one has posted how to over come this issue. Please advice on this.

 

Thanks

↧
↧

Displaying additional data on batch master transaction (MSC3N).

February 23, 2015, 1:19 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

i need to provide additional read-only data in the batch master transaction (MSC3N) for our users.

I searched for possible ways of modifying the dynpro (BADI, user exits), but couldn’t find any way of achieving this so far. Really any kind of extension to the transaction would suffice:

  • adding an additional tabstrip
  • showing additional fields on an existing tabstrip
  • adding a pushbutton or menu item that redirects to a custom Z-Report.

 

My Question is:

Is there a way I can achieve any of the aforementioned extensions to the GUI or doesn’t SAP indeed provide any way of augmenting the batch master transaction without requesting a modification key?


regards,

Stefan

 

↧

Master data trouble with Ordering address

February 23, 2015, 1:00 am
$
0
0

Dear gurus,

 

whe have vendor A with many info records already mantained. Now, we would like to maintain an additional ordering address for that vendor. So we

- created vendor B

- added partner role to master data of vendor A: OA vendor B

- added partner role to master data of vendor B: VN vendor A

 

Now, when we create a PO for vendor A, SAP asks us, which of the two existing ordering addresses is to be used. When we select vendor B here, everything works fine. The PO is sent to vendor B and the info records of vendor A are used.

 

When we create a PO for vendor B, vonder A is automatically found as the VN partner in the PO. But when we try to use an info record for vendor A, SP says:

 

Vendor differs from vendor 20000092 from the info record

Message no. 06314

Diagnosis

The vendor number of the item differs from that of the info record you want to refer to.

Procedure

Check your input.

 

We do not understand why. We think SAP should check against the VN partner here. Are we wrong? Is there a way to change this?

 

Cheers

Alicia

↧
Search

MIR7/MIRO

February 19, 2015, 1:11 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

Normally, when we post MIR7, system checks material stock for FI Posting.

If Material stock available while Posting , it will post to stock g/l

If Material stock not available then system will  post to price difference g/l.

 

Now my requirement is ,

 

Is it possible to check Material stock of particular vendor while MIR7 Posting.

 

i.e if i am posting MIR7 for Vendor ID : V1, for material ID :  M1

Here system should check stock of Vendor V1 for material M1 only and post FI entry accordingly.

 

If it is possible then pl guide me how to do it.

 

 

Thanks & Regards

Swati Shah

↧

Intra company code STO with Different price

February 23, 2015, 3:49 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I have searched in SCN and different forums but couldn't find appropriate solution, so please bear with me.

 

I have following business requirement :-

 

Need to do intra company code STO (Plant A to Plant B)

 

Material :  X

Plant A: 0001     (500 KG material X has been procured in January with price 100 INR per KG in plant 0001)

Plant B: 0002     (price of material can be 90 INR or 110 INR in April)

price control is MAP in both the plant.

 

Profit Center1 : 0001 for plant 0001

Profit Center2 : 0002 for plant 0002

 

500 KG material has been procured in January and kept in plant 0001 till April, meanwhile due to different circumstances 5 KG material got spoiled which is basically loss of profit center 0001. I have to send 200 KG material to plant 0002 for production/further process in a way so that loss would be recovered for profit center 0001. (have to increase price i.e. 120 INR per KG and send to plant 0002). (I am taking 120 INR as an example it can be any amount more than 100 INR.)

 

Current Process: We maintained third plant 0003 with profit center 0001, firstly we maintain price 120 INR in plant 0003 and then transfer material to 0002, so that we can recover loss in profit center 0001, (we use MR21 to change the price which is i think not correct).

(we follow 2 step STO)

 

 

However this is not standard process, but this is how our business requirement is. Please suggest any other way to fulfill this requirement

 

 

Regards

Abhishek

↧
↧

Restrict Invoice on GR reversal movement type 102

February 23, 2015, 2:53 am
$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

In my scenarion i have one PO with 100 quantity with GR-BSD IV check.

 

GR was done for 100 quantity with movement type 101

 

GR was reversed for 100 quantity with movement type 102

 

No at the time of invocing, system is allowing me to post the invoice and i want to restrict that.

 

I know that at the time of Invoice, system does not check for movement type 101 or 102.

 

Please let me know, how can we restrict the Invoice, if GR reversal is perform.

↧

Inforecord Future Validity period

February 23, 2015, 4:02 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

 

 

Assume that the inforecord has only one validity period as 10.05.2013 to 10.05.2020 with price as 100.

We require another price updation, say 125 from period 23.02.2015 to 23.02.2018.

As per the standard behaviour, the system creates three periods as follows;

1) 10.05.2013 to 22.02.2015 - price 100

2) 23.02.2015 to 23.02.2018 - Price 125

3) 24.02.2018 to 10.05.2020 - Price 100

 

 

Is there any way out such that the future period (no. 3) should be deleted from the system?

 

 

 

 

Regards,

SKM

↧

Net Price error for info record greater than PO created date!!!

February 23, 2015, 3:14 am
$
0
0

Hi All ,

I have a query which is a mystery one . There is a schedule agreement which was created on 01.09.2014 and still running for vendor xyz . I wanted to add a new part for the schedule agreement , the info record dated 19.02.2015 is updated for the new part . So as per my knowledge it has to allow the new part into the old schedule agreement .

 

but the fishy part is , it is throwing net price error . I have checked in quality server assuming some Z- validations done , but it is allowing to add the new part for old schedule agreement where as in PRD server it is throwing net price error. Please suggest .

↧
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>