Hi,
How to enable this HANDOVERDATE in Vl31n/vl32n screen under shipment tab header,
is there any config available for this,
In my sandbox the said field is available screenshot attached, but i want to enable in DEV , not able to find the config for the same, we are on EHP7. Please help
Hi Gurus,
I am facing a issue, While doing GRN-Mvt 101Q, reference doc. numb. is same as of GRN no. (5000028914), with delivery note no. as 00415
If I do cancellation of the above GRN-Mvt 102Q (5000028915), reference doc. numb, is of GRN No. 5000028914, again with delivery note no. as 00415
But now when I again try to do a GRN-Mvt 101, with same PO & with same delivery note no. as 00415, I get a new GRN no. 5000028916, but here reference document num. appears to be of original GRN--5000028914,
Although while posting second GRN--mvt 101Q, no reference of first GRN was took.
Please suggest, what could be the reason behind it.
Thanks in advance
Sanchit Agarwal
Hi Experts,
In our system we maintain the below process.
Sales Order - Purchase Order - MIGO - MIRO - Outbound Delivery - PGI - Billing.
Purchase Order assign with Sales Order. so, when we get GRN the stock value capture against Sales Order.
We maintain Moving Average Price.
When we get PGI then it capture the Stock value against Material Moving Average price. My requirement is, how it capture the same value (Stock) from MIGO.
Example in current process :
Sales Order SO value Purchase Order PO Value MIGO Value
SO01 1000 PO01 600 600
SO02 1200 PO02 800 800
when we get PGI against SO01 & SO02 the PGI stock value 700 for both case. but out requirement, for SO01 it will be 600 & for SO02 it will be 800.
Please suggest.
With regards,
Uttam Maity
Hi Gururs, I am not sure if I need to ask this question here or in abap forum..but let me take a shot here first.
supplier sends us the asn, and through edi we create a indound delivery in our system using IDOC (DESADV, DELVRYO3, IDOC_INDPUT_DESADV1). working perfect, no issues here..
supplier sends changes to the inbound deliveries..which IDOC should I use to amke the changes? if I use message type desadv as above, it is creating a new inbound delivery and not changing the existing inbound delivery even though I am referecing it in the IDOC.
so I tries using SHPCON, it is giving me a wierd mesage "transfer order not created". why is system giving this message if I am not even doing a GR? i am just chaging the existing inbound deliveries delivary date. thats all i am doing...
so what message type should I use to change the inbound delivery..
Thx
Swathi
Hi Experts,
My problem is when a transfer posting is done with reference to reservation (movement 412Q) from the transaction MIGO, the wbs element isn't transfered to the field WBS in the label "Transfer Posting" but to the field WBS element in the label "Account Assignment".
Is possible to fill wbs field in "Transfer Posting" label instead of the field in "Account Assigment" label .
Please have a look to this screenshots.
Thank you very much!!!
Hi,
For few of the material documents with Mvt type 501 posted on same date , in MSEG table , the controlling area field (MSEG-KOKRS) is blank and field PROJN has value 00000000 .
Please let me know what does this indicates and why the field is blank.
Also whether this has any effect on the stock situation .
Thanks!!!!
Sameer
Hi All,
We have a PO email output ZNEU which keeps failing because sometimes the email address has not been maintained in the vendor master. So when we check it in the PO it looks in status "yellow", but it is not turning up in SOST transaction. A lot of POs are failing like this and due to large volume we are not able to check each and every PO individually.
Could someone tell me where can we check those POs which have failed,gone into error or are just hanging in status yellow for the email output?
Best Regards,
V S
Hello,
We are facing one issue at client place, where in PO change mode, when we update material with invalid material no, it gives error : The material xxxx does not exist or not activated. Message No M3305. But if we delete same line ( containing invalid material#) it is not giving error message and allows to save PO. We want the same error message even while deletion. Help..
Hi Experts,
I am trying to create a info record by selecting "Info Update" indicator in PO. so I customized setting in IMG for plant and also maintain the user parameter(EVO) in user profile (SU01).
so when i am creating a PO for vendor "X" and Material "Y" .By default "Info update" indicator is selected and after filling all details in PO when i do "check" it becomes unselected and after saving the PO if info record is created to check that when I go to ME12 Transaction for the same Material and Vendor combination,no Info record is exists.
And to check the functionality of Info Update indicator,I created another PO from existing info record and this time Info update indicator remain selected and i changed the tolerances and reminders but there is no update in material master .What should I do? Help me please
Hello MM gurus,
Had questions on 2 different scenarios involving the MIRO process, please help me out with them.
1) If we return(122) the entire material quantity on the PO, to the material vendor, before any invoicing was done,how can we still pay the freight vendor? Obviously we cannot use the PO on MIRO, since that PO line will not show up anymore since the quantity was returned. If we pay against the material, I can't really put any quantity against it since the entire quantity was returned. I am stumped for an answer.
2) If there are freight condition lines on a PO, that should have never been there in the first place(obviously wrongly added), and GR has already happened, is there any way to handle this situation in MIRO? We know for sure those freight invoices will never come, so what do we do to eliminate GR-IR differences, when we do the MIRO for the material involved? Reversing the GR to remove the freight lines on the PO and then re-doing the GR is a painful option, as QC will have to get involved again when re-doing the GR, and I want to avoid that.
Any input on the above 2 questions will be greatly appreciated,
Thanks and regards,
Wayfarer
HI team,
My user wants maintain a single batch for the material for life time in all his plants. He already maintained the split valuation for the materials.
So, as per his requirement, for a material, system should consider a specific permanent Batch irrespective of valuation types.
So, is there any user exit or BADI for the same to process the same?
Actually, first he wanted to de-activate the Batch management for some 98 materials. But, as we know, to de-activate the batch management for a running material, there should not be any existing stocks, open orders (PO, SO, Production Orders), reservations, deliveries etc,. for all these 98 materials. But, unfortunately, for all these materials, there are existing stocks, orders and deliveries.
We have suggested him to clear all these to de-activate the Batch management. But, he doesn't want to do it. Because, he has a large business. If he deletes the SO's, PO's, Deliveries (Huge number of data is existing), then he cannot proceed with his day to day activities. Business may stops.
Many of the users can't proceed with their regular activities.
So, he asked us to maintain a single batch for a material for life time. For this material, when ever goods movement happens, system should automatically take it's permanent batch which is existing. If it can be developed, then he has no need to de-activate the batch management. But, system will not create the batches in background for these materials during the goods movements. It always picks the material's permanent batch which is defined for that specific material.
So, can anybody suggest if there is any to achieve this critical requirement.
Thanks in advance for your support!
Regards,
Satya
Hi,
I have just created new UOM via CUNI transaction (please see image attached). I have created thi UOM because I need 9 decimal places instead of 2 (standard configuration).
Unfortunately, when I try to create new contract via ME31K, I get same message again (please see screenshot bellow).
What I am doing wrong?
Many thanks in advance for prompt replies!
Sam
Hi,
I need to view the archived master master.
When I checked in forum I found out it can be done through tcode SARA
and object MM_MATNR. But I cant find archived material master in it.
Please guide me.
regards
sathya
Gurus,
We have below issues in the Purchase Requisitions generated from Work Orders:
The Log on Language is Spanish, So the work order is created in Spanish.
The material Short text also is in Spanish as required.
When the purchase requisition is generated, the material short text is coming up in English.
We have all the settings in place and are not able to pin point the issue. The vendor communication languageand the Material Description are maintained in Spanish.
It is a requirement by the client.
Please help.
Regards,
Raksha
Hi,
We added Z-field in PO item level (EKPO).
Requirement is any change to this field should not tirgger change output type. Did any one faced similar issue.
I maintained this Z-field in config node:Fields Relevant to Printouts of Changes. and did not select its relevancy for the PO.
Even then system is triggering change output type.
Regards,
Raghava
Dear All
my client use MPN material and set AMPL and create MPN material with material type HERS.
when run MRP systems create PR for internal material and we want to be determined MPN material in PR
let me take example: we have internal material AB and we have two MPN material AB1 with Manufacture V1,AB2 with Manufacture V2 stock of AB1 is 10 pc and stock of AB2 is 0 pc and we have requirement from AB2 Qty=5
when i run MRP system create PR for AB (internal material) but we want system to be determined MPN material AB2 in PR with Manufacture V2.please guide me how can system automatically procurement MPN material AB2 or how can create PR for material AB with MPN AB2
best regards
R.T
Hi All,
I have one material and one vendor for which I dont have info records.
While creating PO(ME21n) , I tick the info update radio button on material tab but after after pressing Enter this tick becomes disable.
What is the cause??
I want to crete Info record by using info update indicator.
Also I read many threads on SCN but not able to find answer for this.
At customization conditions allowed for both with or without plant selected.
Regards,
Abhijeet Kadam
During the upload of the data of the Vendors and Clients, a lot of problems happening and one of them was the House_Num1 without any values.
Checking for the ones that were empty and narrowing the search for just the ones that the ADDR_GROUP was BP, I've founded three differents ADDRNUMBER for the same name.
Follow printscreen:
The second ADDRNUMBER is related to the Client and the third Vendor.
And the first addr. no.? Is related to what?
Hi Gurus,
When we create a material by Idoc MATMAS05, the MBEW & MBEWH tables are being updated different than when you try to create a material by MM01 manually.
Please take this example as reference:
- Material 24 was manually created by MM01, at the moment of the creation the VPRSV field was updated with V value.
- Material XX03-01P005-008WR was created by the Idoc, and it does not have the Value in the VPRSV field.
In addition, those materials that are created by the Idoc have two change created at the same time in the material master change log.
Could you tell me why is this happening? We are facing problems when we try to post a GR by an external system, but this is only happening with those materials that do not have the value "V" in the moving average price field in the MBEWH table.
Thank you.
Regards,
incorrect Idoc type corrected - edited by: Jürgen L
Folks,
I have come across an issue where I have say a material A123456XXX which has a Material Master and the unlimited delivery indicator checked. Also, this material is not required an Info record so I don't have one setup for it neither I need it. I go ahead and create a PO with this material and under the delivery tab I believe the Unlimited Delivery check box should come Pre-checked. However, this ain't happening.
A few question:
1. Is this unlimited check box in the PO is derived from the Info record or the material master, or may be I should ask what is prioritized based on what is existing for that material?
So this should answer the question that if i do not have a info record for the material will the driving force, for the box to be auto checked in the PO, will be Material Master or not?
2. If there is no info record but the material master seems to be right, then whats stopping the unlimited delivery box from getting checked in the PO automatically.
Hope this gives a clear picture for answers to flood in..
Thanks in advance for any help you could render.
Ani...