Dear Gurus,
Our Business user requested for the blow requirement.
Possible field to show self certified items and inspection items in MIGO or while making usage decision by Quality person.
OSS notes for similar case if available kindly share.
Thanks in Advance.
Vignesh.V
Plz.let me know with the possible reasons for the price not getting updated in the Sch.agreement from the respective contract?
Hi All,
We are using a custom table having maint. order type, maint. order priority & PR document type from where system picks PR document type during auto generation of PR from maintenance order . Initially PR doc. type was urgent as priority maintained in order is 2(Urgent) . Now, it is observed that this PR document type has been changed to normal (NB) which is corresponding to maint. order of priority 3 (Normal) .From change document of PR, it is found that PR document type was changed from t-code IW32. But when I am checking action log of the maint. order at IW32 , there is no change document regarding order priority & same priority 2(urgent) only prevails in the order .
Can anyone please let me know the reason for changing PR document type as doc. type of this auto generated PR can not be changed using t-code ME52N.
Thanking you all.
rgds,
Dear experts
I am facing a problem on bom explosion in po. In PO there is no co-product is showing while bom explosion butother components are showing.But in Tcode CS12 all components along with co-product is showing .I have checked all settings like co-product material master MRP2 view co-product checkbox is ticked, In BoM also co-product item details co-product is ticked . Finished product MRP 2 view special procurement is set 30(subcontracting) . Bom validity is also ok. Help to solve the issue.???
Hi Experts,
We have done Archive material documents(MM_MATBEL) upto 31st December, 2012. Which we can see from Mb51 by selecting the option Read data from Archive in MB51 tcode. Now we are doing MC.9 stock report. But here in the Last movement date column the date before 01.01.2013 is not showing. But we need to see these. See the below image:
See the date started to show from last movement date 01.01.2013 after ascending it. Is it possible to show the year 2012 movement here from Archive ? If yes then how ?
Thanks
Asad
Hi,
Would like to know if anyone had a chance to get a SAP Note or a custom build program to insert the Userid or user's name into this PR box for approval?
The objective here is to let the creator of the PR know who should be approving and who will be approving next.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Hi Expert,
Client requirement is very basic but i am facing a lot of challenge to meet the requirement.
Client need the following report-
PR Number-PR Item Number-PR Item Value-PO Number-PO Item Number-PO Value
PR Number and PO Number will be the input parameter.
I got PR Number/Item Number/PO Number PO Item number from EKET, but values are not there.
In EBAN, it is showing only latest PO w.r.t PR.
Please suggest if any SAP Note is also there
Thankx in Advance
Sunil Yadav
I have a scenario where PO was created using XXX service group. No service activity maintained in PO, it is just text we have maintained. In Line Item level Material Data Tab we have entered Vendor Material No XXXXXX which is sales Material. We did not maintain any material or service grp in material master as well. But while creating Service Entry Sheet, system is picking some other Material Group in ESLL - MATKL..This doesnt happen for every Service Entry. Plz guide How system picked material; group in service entry sheet.
regards,
Rohit
Dear,
I am experiencing difficulties once I try to perform MEI1/MEI2.
My case is I have created a PO today with a normal PB00 (from an Inforecord) and after I have created the PO (note the GR and IR have not yet been done) I have later today created a Condition RL01 (1%) with MEK1, for the Vendor, valid from 01.07.2010 until 31.12.1999.
Now I want to update the PO with this RL01 Condition.
Therefore I customized the following (based on input I gathered from this and other forums) IMG-activities within MM>Conditions>Automatic Document Adjustment:
1. Activate Change Pointer for Message Category CONDBI;
flagged CONDBI as active
2. Control Purchasing Document Adjustment;
Added the following:
30 RL01 Vendor Discount % 2 Pricing 44 Vendor
Now as I learn from the i(nfo)-button/Program Documentation in MEI1, besides the customizing and the fact that GR/IR must not be posted yet, I have to run RMEBEIN4/MEI4 first and from the forums I learned that I also first need to run MEI3 in case the Document index active-indicator (LFM1-BLIND) is not set in my Vendor master.
Since we have not/do not want to set this indicator, I first ran MEI3 with the following fields inputted:
u2022 Save under version = 000
u2022 Purchasing document = my test PO
u2022 Automatic document adjustment = X
u2022 Subsequent settlement = X
u2022 Name of run = u2018testu2019
u2022 New run? = X
u2022 Termination date = 20.07.2010 (=Today)
u2022 Termination time = 12:00
This goes presumibly well since I get the following message: Entries were created for 1 documents in the index.
Next I ran MEI4:
Flagged the following indicators:
u2022 Purchasing documents
u2022 Pricing Documents
u2022 Flag processed change pointers for reorganization
u2022 Flag all change pointers for reorganization
Set the Condition change date from = 01.07.2010 to 31.12.2010
Also, this goes presumibly well since I get the following message: Worklist generated successfully
Next I ran MEI1 and then the fun is overu2026
I inputted the following:
u2022 Purchase Documents: my test PO
u2022 Price Determination Type = New price determ. for changed price elements, adopt manual
u2022 Manual selection of Worklist (Documents) to Be processed = X
u2022 Delete worklist after processing = X
u2022 Maximum Documents for Each Processing Step During Asynchronous Update = 1
Then, nothing happens since I get the following message:
No documents belonging to document category Purchase Order/Scheduling Agre adjusted
Message no. NI050
Diagnosis
You have not chosen any documents of category 'Purchase Order/Scheduling Agre' for processing.
Procedure
Please check your selections.
Can anybody tell me what I am doing wrong here and how I can get this thing working?
Thanks a whole lot in advance!
Hello,
I want to maintanin following scenario. I have a material which price depend on date of delivery
If I want to order material from 1.4.2015 to 1.6.2015 price should be 10€.
If I want to order this material from 2.6.2015 to 31.12.9999 price should be 12€.
So I have created inforecord for vendor - material.
On Purchase organization data 1 tab I filled indicator Price Determination (Pricing) Date Control with key number 2 Delivery date.
Than I maintained conditions for all validity periods above. In each validity period I maintained Condition type PB00.
But when I created PO price is still the same - according to first validity period.
I followed this topics:
and this manual:
Price Determination - Purchasing (MM-PUR) - SAP Library
(same scenario is at the bottom).
Please, can someone help me? Thank you in advance.
Dear MM gurus.
I’d like to retrieve stock qty of Serialized material in past period.
If current perio is Mar, I'd like to retrieve stock data of end of Feb.
In table MARD or MARDH, I could retrieve qty with stock type such as
“how many qty is unrestricted” and “how many qty is QI”.
However, there is no history table for serialized material.
So, I cannot know which serial number is unresricted or QI in Feb.
Table EQBS display only "Current status", not histrical status.
And, EQBS cannot create change document.
Is there any good way?
Yoshi
Hi Team,
We were looking for options of adding multiple UOM to the rounding profile.We have our material in base unit of measure as Cases (CS) . We have maintained the alternate units of measure for these materials as Layers(12 Cases=1 Layer) and Pallets (15 Cases= 1 Pallet). We had created rounding rule 1 whereby Layer had a 30% rounding up and rounding down value and pallets had a 70 % rounding up value alone. It is observed that we could associate with only 1 of the alternate Unit in rounding profile even though rounding rule is associated with more than 1. Is there an option whereby system could do the rounding based on the alternate UOM selected when we have rules with multiple UOM defined and when the material master has multiple UOM as well
Regards
Nevin
Hello,
I had a requirement from the client, For Contract Quantity and Value are not fixed but only price of the material is fixed for a particular period.
How to achieve this by Contract?
If we consider Value contract what are the configuration changes to be done.
By using value contract can we update the info record price? How can we achieve this
Thanks & Regards
Raghu
Hi Experts!
I have an Special Thing from our Italian plant.
They would Group certain Materials to get an Scale netprice, even they are in separate positions in the Purchase Order.
Example:
Material A 1000 Pcs.
Material B 1000 Pcs.
The Scale netprice starts at 2000 Pcs., and should give the Price to my two positions.
I know the MEKK for the Vendor subranges, but thats not cross all positions.
Can anyone help me in this case?
Best Regards
Florian
Hi,
We have below cycle count process.
1) batch job/ micn runs and creates physical documents
2) z tcode which prints the cycle count sheet for the inventory cycle count user. User enters the physical count quantities in this tcode which eventually updates tcode MI04.
We don't use ABC analysis as much since it's not as beneficial as it's supposed to be for our business scenario and adds overhead maintenance.
There are many items which we store in the inventory that are need to be always maintained, so even if there is not much movement going on ,we MUST ALWAYS store them. We must cycle count them on a regular basis so we can't set them as C(one a year) and count only once a year. So suggestion is to present these materials for counting ONLY if there was some movement on them say within prior 12 months otherwise we will skip it from cycle counting ( but also have them as indicator as A) assuming the quantity is maintained.
Obviously, there is no option to consider the movement posting date (tables MSEG/MKPF) on MICN during creation of physical document. I may add it in Z tcode from step 2 where it presents to the user for actual cycle counting. If I do this, I understand that there will be discrepancy in the physical documents as there will be physical document created in the system during MICN but no quantity posted in MI04 as I am skipping this part. So next time it may not create the physical document unless the previous document is fulfilled or this stranded physical document might cause other issues that I am not aware of. MI24 will show this document as not counted forever.
Can someone suggest how to handle this scenario?
Thanks,
DK
Hi,
We use ECC 6.0 EHP5 for the new functionality Direct shipment which combines Third Party + Subcontracting,
Process followed is
However we face difficulty in getting the VPRS Cost in Customer Billing Document as it refers to MIRO which does not consider Material costs of Assembly and components. Hence COPA is not getting updated. Our requirement is to have Billing Pricing copy control from MIGO and not from MIRO so as to update COPA.
Any clues?
Regards,
Vengat
Hello.
We have available in our environment STO process that ends with a FI vendor invoice generated with the help of EDI message triggered from RD04 message.
Can someone mention if possible and how could we have an MM vendor invoice generated via EDI? The FI invoice has some minuses, most notable is the lack of (NBXE) PO history update that shows it as being opened and unpaid.
Thank you.
Hello team of experts,
I am Krishna working on a VIM-ABAP assignment.
My client has deductions in requirement. His system is on EHP7 so he got "Payment Processing" tab in PO header. He is giving retention % and so % is getting deducted in invoice.
My questions for you are
1. Is retention in Payment Processing only option to deduct the money?
2. If we have other ways, what they are?
3. How invoicing is handled?
Please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Krishna.
Hi, experts.
My client has an inbound interface where MK contracts are created and modified based on data provided from the interface.
Now we have been noticed that when we access one of these contracts via me32k and go to "Item Details", a popup (see attach) is thrown, asking to inform Tax Jurisdiction.
The thing is that this interface hasn't been changed for a long period and we cannot figure it out why it is not setting taxjurcode automatically anymore (field EKPO-TXJCD).
Can you guy help?
My best regards,
Alm
Hello Gurus,
When PO is changed the total value is displaying as 0 in spool, but where as in print preview of the changed PO the total value is displaying correctly.
In case of fresh PO creation, the PO total value is get printed in print preview as well in spool.
Can any one help me to find out is there any configuration or condition maintenance for change PO total value, if so where it is maintained.
help will be really appreciated.
Warm Regards,
Karthikeyan M
SAP MM.