Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Possibility of a delay in updating stock history tables

March 15, 2016, 1:31 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

To begin with, I'm familiar with the update behavior of the stock history tables through sap note 193554.

My concern is regarding on the first goods movement for a period which would warrant an update on the closing price of the previous period on the history tables.

Is it always updated together with the main table? (ex. MCHB) Or is there a possibility of a delay of update for the history tables? (ex. MCHBH)

 

 

P.S. I did some testing and so far the update comes together, but we have an issue that suggests the possibility of a delay in the update.

 

P.S. 2 - This post has been rejected two times already by a moderator who keeps insisting to talk this problem with an abap developer. I don't know how to contact this moderator so I'll just post here that I'm the ABAP developer and I have drilled down the issue into this, hence this post.

 

 

Regards,

Akira

↧
Search

Can anybody please share me SAP MM glossary..

March 21, 2016, 10:59 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Can anybody please share me SAP MM glossary..

↧
↧

Regarding issue in field valuation class in BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA

March 17, 2016, 11:06 am
$
0
0

Hello,

I'm using BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA to create a new accounting 1 view for an existing material. In this new view I assign new valuation class for material.

BAPI is returning error messages:

The field MBEW-BKLAS/BAPI_MBEW-VAL_CLASS is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry

The field MBEW-VJBKL/BAPI_MBEW-VCLASS_PY is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry

The field MBEW-VMBKL/BAPI_MBEW-VCLASS_PP is defined as a required field; it does not contain an entry

 

I checked and these fields are filled in corresponding BAPI table (BAPI_MBEW).

I checked configuration in OMSR (selection group 31) and in OMS9 also and for material type (in my case material type is "REF") fields are configured as optional entry.

 

There are another settings to check or anyone knows what might be happening?

 

Thanks,

Cristian Argüello

↧

Rejection Process for Subcontracting Item after acceptance

March 21, 2016, 3:09 am
$
0
0

Dear Sir,

 

We have a following business scenario :

 

A Casting (item-code c1 )was purchased from vendor v1 and after the GR and quality inspection it was accepted and stock created as unrestricted one .

 

Subsequently , a subcontracted purchase order (p1) was made for a machined casting (item-code cm1) and the bom of cm1 has child item as c1 . This po was placed to vendor v2 .   The material c1 was transferred to vendor stock in reference of PO  p1 .

 

On receipt of material , GR was done for cm1 and this consumed the item c1 .   Subsequently , quality also accepted this material .

 

Later on this material was issue to some other production order and there it was detected that material cm1 is defective as there are some blow holes in casting at a deep level . 

 

Then , we reversed the issuance of cm1 and cm1 was made available in stock .

 

The problem is that , now we need to get the original casting c1 to be made available in stock  so that it can be rejected and send back to vendor v1. 

 

I request expert members to kindly guide us as what steps need to be followed to address this scenario.

 

 

With Regards

 

B Mittal

↧

New Payment block need to picked in MIRO instead of R

March 21, 2016, 8:51 am
$
0
0

Hi All

 

My client is posting MIRO and because of Quality inspection is pending it is being blocked for payment with Indicator "R"

 

Now my client want to pick automatically "Q" block indicator in the MIRO if the stock is being pending in Quality inspection instead of "R".

 

Your quick response is highly appreciable on this where can we customize the same?

 

Regards

Hassan Mohammad

↧
↧

Plant Desciption/Vendor Part No. required for MB51 / Need to export MB5B & MB51 Reports to Excel

March 21, 2016, 6:31 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We have an urgent requirement in which user want include Plant Description,Vendor Part No in MB51 report. As these two fields are not available in MSEG table how to include them without going for a Z transaction?

 

Also user want to export  MB5B and MB51 report to excel sheet. I have checked in my system Export to spreadsheet option is not active in both the transaction. Please suggest how to activate the same?

 

Thanks & Regards,

Rudra

↧

Impact of copying Brasilian Plants to Peruvian, Colombian Company codes

March 21, 2016, 12:05 pm
$
0
0

Hi guys,

 

I have the following situation at hand.

Im in a rollout process where I have to copy the organization structure and proceses which are at the moment implemented in a Brasilian company code. The rollout has to be to Chilean, Colombian and Peruvian Company codes.

 

To create the  company codes in these countries, we  will use the country-specific Companycodes already defined in SAP to take into account specific legal and localization themes of these countries.

 

However, the plants, we will have to copy from Brasilian Plants and afterwards assign them to this specific Company code per country. Im not sure this will provoke problems in the logistics processes due to the specific regulations in Brasil! Will there be problems with tables which will not be copied or will be disabled upon assigning the new plant (copy form Brasil) to the Company codes of the countries.

 

Anyone has experience with this setup! What should be the best way to proceed in this?

 

Thanks for any answer.

 

Aart

↧

MC.1 Report Showing different data every time it is executed

March 21, 2016, 4:24 am
$
0
0

Hello All,

 

User had executed MC.1 (on 4th and 7th March) for the month of FEB and each time the Valuated stock/ValStockVlaue values are coming different for one material type (although periods has already been closed for FEB). She executed the report twice on 4th March, first at 14:49 and second one at 23:20 still the valuated stock is coming different each time for only one material type. Same is the case on 7th March.

I have already looked in MSEG/MKPF for any document with document date in March and posting date in FEB, but there is nothing.

 

The main requirement is "There needs to be a report to reconcile the Inventory sub ledger (with material # detail) against the inventory General Ledger balances at period close (month end) and the closest that comes to that is the MC.1 report"

 

I tried to tell her to use MB5B and MB51, but she is not quite convinced. They are e

 

So I have two questions here:

 

1. How and where can I see what is going wrong with this report,

2. What could be the other options to get this data for her.

3. What is the basic logic of calculation of these stocks in MC.1, what all parameters get considered at the time of calculation.

 

Any other info or help would be a great help.

↧
Search

Return to Vendor 161 with outbound delivery

March 11, 2009, 3:22 am
$
0
0

Hello

 

I have a problem when trying to return stock to a vendor.  I have created a return PO and checked the Return to vendor flag.

 

I have changed a delivery type to pick up movement type 161

 

The delivery is created and picking up the correct movement but when i try to post goods issue I receive the message below.

 

I know i could create a new movement type to create the update control but I would have thought that this was standard functionality... Am I doing something wrong?

 

Thanks

Sue

 

 

 

 

Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 161 X X _ L)

Message no. M7226

Diagnosis

The system could not find entry 161 X X _ L in any of the movement type control tables.

Procedure

Cancel current processing.

Contact your system administrator.

Action to be taken by the system administrator

Check in Customizing for Inventory Management under Copy, Change Movement Types whether the entry is contained in the Update control view for the movement type.

If the entry is missing, proceed as follows:

·     For standard movement types, this means that the given process is not supported using the present data combination. Do not create any entries without prior arrangement with your SAP consultant. Otherwise, incorrect postings may result.

·     For customer-defined movement types (beginning with 9, X, Y, or Z), this may mean that they have not been fully defined. Delete the movement type and re-create it by copying a standard movement type.

 

↧
↧

Tax Code Creation Date

March 22, 2016, 5:37 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Can some one suggest me, where can I find the creation date for a tax code? Have tried the tables like T007A, T007S. But they did not help. Please suggest.

 

Thanks,

Mayank

↧

Atp check for special stock M(returnable packaging parts Vendor)

March 22, 2016, 6:57 am
$
0
0

Dear experts

 

I am testing RTP with vendor ..

 

there are two things to confirm

 

1.MRP don't consider the special stock M.

2.ATP don't consider the special stock M. so the ATP can't confirm.

 

Does it's SAP standard logic?

 

Thanks.

↧

MSEG-SGTXT field in MB1A T.code

December 7, 2009, 2:44 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I'm entering item text for the 551 movement type in MB1A T.Code but it is not being stored in any table MSEG / BSEG. Could any one tell me How to store and retrive this text because I want to Write tect which is important for Business information purpose.

 

Thanks and Regards

 

Ramana

↧

MIRO - Duplicate Invoice check for Fiscal year

March 22, 2016, 1:15 am
$
0
0

Hi Guys,

 

I have a requirement, where I need to give the error/warning message ,if invoice in MIRO is posted with same Reference number ,same amount , same PO and same Company Code , but with other date in the same fiscal year .

 

Right now if date is in another fiscal year , then also it is providing the message .

 

e.g

 

Already posted Invoice :

Refrence : DEVTEST3

Amount : 2 000,00

PO : 2050664973

Company Code : 1226

Date   05.12.2015

 

If trying to post the invoice in next fiscal year , then it should not give the message .

 

Refrence : DEVTEST3

Amount : 2 000,00

PO : 2050664973

Company Code : 1226

Date   22.03.2016

 

Kindly let me know , how to achieve it.

 

Thanks,

Sachin Sharma

↧
↧

Backflush Handling Unit Error

March 22, 2016, 9:47 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

When trying to put material into a backflush handling unit from an IM location using ZWX46, I get an error message that reads "Material move completed.  Tag Merge to Backflush HU failed.

 

Instead of putting this material into the correct HU, it puts it into a new HU - this is where I try to use ZWX18A and perform a backflush tag merge, function 4500.  I then get an error message that says "Call of transaction LT01 failed for Material XXXX Message no. ZD131."

 

I cannot seem to understand why I am unable to put material into this backflush bin.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

↧

Intercompany flow and customer storage loction

March 22, 2016, 11:10 am
$
0
0

Dear gurus

 

in the business schari owe manage two different flow:

- STO between storage location of the same plant

- IC order between storage location of different plant/companies.

 

the requirement is to manage a customer code (customizing setting) for the receiving storage location, in order to have the correct "Ship to party" in the delivery.

In the STO process no issuse, the entire flow is closed correctly.

 

In the IC process, the partner determination in the delivery is not correct, because in the LIKP the field KUNIV  "customer number for Intercompany billing" has the value of the customer attributed to the receiving storage location and not to the customer attributed (customzing setting) to the company.

 

Can I solve the issue via standard setting?

 

 

Thanks in advance

 

Marco

↧
Search

VMI: creation of PO for vendor

March 22, 2016, 12:21 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am trying to set up the VMI process where the PO gets created by an incoming ORDRSP IDOC. What program / FM should trigger the creation (FM VMI_PO_CREATE_FROM_ORDRSP_VMI)?


I get the following error when processing the inbound IDOC with WE19 / FM IDOC_INPUT_ORDRSP:  Purchasing document XX does not exist (ME751).


Any help appreciated.


Thanks

↧

Jurisd. Code at PO Item Level not triggering any validations

March 22, 2016, 12:54 pm
$
0
0

Hi Friends,

 

Recently we applied lot of Brazil taxation notes in the system. Due to this or for some other reason, none of the tax jurisdiction validations are working in our systems.

 

For example:

 

1. Now, In ME22/ME22N transaction at item level under Invoice tab we can maintain any free text in Jurisd. Code field.

 

Earlier, if we enter more than 10 digits on the tax jurisdiction field, we used to get an invalid length error.

 

Today, we can enter anything in this field and save it.

 

Please find screenshot attached for reference.

 

2. Also at the vendor address section in the header, we can enter free text in the jurisdiction code field. No validations are triggering.

 

Vertex RFC connection is working fine.

 

Please help.

 

Thanks,

Phani.

↧
↧

Specify Jurisdiction Key MIRO GL Tab

March 22, 2016, 1:52 pm
$
0
0

Been trying to figure this out for a few days. Looked at hundreds of posts but seems no one else has had this issue!

 

All settings in SPRO appear correct per the many other posts that talk about how they should be configured. On the PO Reference Tab the jurisdiction code is being populated without issue.

 

When entering line items on the GL tab getting error "Specify A Tax Jurisdiction Key" when a Sales Order is used. When using a cost center, no problem. The customer that is getting the order is in the U.S. and their jurisdiction code is populated.

 

Vendor is one of our companies in Germany, and we are in US. Cannot populate Jurisdiction Code in vendor master since they are in Germany (tax procedure assigned to vendor does not allow it). Tax for this MIRO entry is set to I/O Tax Exempt so in my opinion it shouldn't be looking for anything to do with tax.

 

I debugged and the line item field (ACGL_ITEM-TXJCD) is being checked to see if it is blank and if it is, throw the error. Then it sets the cursor to this field.

 

One problem is that this field is not showing up at all. There is no tax jurisdiction field available under line items and GL tab. Looked at screen variants for this area (which is actually program SAPLSFKB and screen 0100 inserted into MIRO...NOT BSEG or DRSEG) and they all say to show this TXJCD field (not invisible...along with a ton of other fields that don't show up)...yet it doesn't show.

 

I'm thinking that since the field is not showing up maybe that is why it is not being automatically populated as it should be.

 

The end user is telling me that it has been like this "forever" and they can simply hit enter a bunch of times and eventually it takes the line item.

 

1.) Is there something about MIRO itself that says do not show the TXJCD field under GL Tab? Did SAP do this on purpose and I just don't know why or is this an actual bug? I feel if this field was showing, we could put a Jurisdiction Code in there and it would be fine. Doesn't show..can't enter anything.

 

2.) The GL they are posting to is set up for Input Tax Only. If I set it to allow all, the lines go in no problem but my gut says that GL is set up like that for a reason and I don't want to change it until I feel safe about that. The G/L is also set to allow non tax postings and seeing how this MIRO entry is I/O tax exempt...seems it shouldn't matter.

 

All ears here! Any suggestions are welcomed.

 

Thx

↧

purchase order position: changing of stock type and delivery adress

March 23, 2016, 7:25 am
$
0
0

Dear experts,

 

i have to implement an enhancement when an purchase order will be created.

 

In this PO I have tho change the stock type of some positions:

stock type.JPG

And the delivery adress of some positions:

 

delivery address.JPG

Could anyone recommend any FMs, EXITS, or BADIs to implement these?

I'd be really grateful for any kind of help!

 

BR

 

Denis.

↧

SAP CR and unknown value

March 23, 2016, 12:18 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I need to know what is the solution to solve the below ..

 

if you have 4 CR created in SAP and you don't know how much you will pay the vendor so the PO that will comeout is same in CR, after meeting the vendor you know the amount so change again in PO.

 

but the problem you have specific amount separated to the 4CR, by change in PO we need to change on other PO.

 

my question is by doing the above what is the way to monitor the amount in 4CR without exceeding the budget ??

↧
Viewing all 7060 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>